292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15099245)
1. Oregon versus Ashcroft: pain relief, physician-assisted suicide, and the Controlled Substances Act.
Rich BA
Pain Med; 2002 Dec; 3(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 15099245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Who defines "legitimate medical practice?" Lessons learned from the Controlled Substances Act, physician-assisted suicide, and Oregon v. Ashcroft.
Gast S
Va J Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(2):261-91. PubMed ID: 16493846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Oregon v. Ashcroft.
United States. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Wests Fed Rep; 2004; 368():1118-49. PubMed ID: 16477722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gonzales versus Oregon:the Oregon Death with Dignity Act Meets the Controlled Substances Act.
Rich BA
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother; 2007; 21(3):79-85. PubMed ID: 18032363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bio-ethics and physician liability: the liability effects of developing pain management standards.
Stark SE
St Thomas Law Rev; 2002; 14(3):601-40. PubMed ID: 12741384
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Justices reject U.S. bid to block assisted suicide; Court, 6-3, says attorney general was wrong in Oregon case.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2006 Jan; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 16432926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Pain Relief Promotion Act: will it spell death to "death with dignity" or is it unconstitutional?
Fallek J
Fordham Urban Law J; 2000 Aug; 27(6):1739-92. PubMed ID: 12452153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The US Supreme Court decision on assisted suicide and the prescription of pain medication: limit the celebration.
Kapp MB
J Opioid Manag; 2006; 2(2):73-4. PubMed ID: 17315421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Physician-assisted suicide in Oregon: a medical perspective.
Hendin H; Foley K
Mich Law Rev; 2008 Jun; 106(8):1613-40. PubMed ID: 18595218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Court rejects challenge to Oregon's assisted suicide law.
AIDS Policy Law; 1997 Apr; 12(6):7. PubMed ID: 11364185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The assisted-suicide decision.
N Y Times Web; 2006 Jan; ():A22. PubMed ID: 16429626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Congress, controlled substances, and physician-assisted suicide--elephants in mouseholes.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2006 Mar; 354(10):1079-84. PubMed ID: 16525147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Dispensing of controlled substances to assist suicide. Interpretive rule.
Department of Justice
Fed Regist; 2001 Nov; 66(218):56607-8. PubMed ID: 11760766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Oregon's guidelines for physician-assisted suicide: a legal and ethical analysis.
O'Brien CN; Madek GA; Ferrera GR
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 2000; 61(2):329-65. PubMed ID: 12625322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Not DEA'd yet: Gonzales v. Oregon.
Baron CH
Hastings Cent Rep; 2006; 36(2):8. PubMed ID: 16604888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Fraught issue, but narrow ruling in Oregon suicide case.
Egan T; Liptak A
N Y Times Web; 2006 Jan; ():A16. PubMed ID: 16429627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Oregon Death with Dignity Act: reversal of the Department of Justice's position on physician assisted suicide and the ensuing court battle.
Brumbaugh RJ
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 2002; 21(2):377-94. PubMed ID: 15212019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Thwarting assisted suicide threatens palliative care.
Meisel A
Med Ethics (Burlingt Mass); 2003; 10(1):4, 8. PubMed ID: 16175723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Justices explore U.S. authority over states in assisted suicide.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2005 Oct; ():A1, A32. PubMed ID: 16231463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
Sayeed SA
Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
