82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15100142)
1. MR mammary ductography using a microscopy coil for assessment of intraductal lesions.
Kanemaki Y; Kurihara Y; Itoh D; Kamijo K; Nakajima Y; Fukuda M; Van Cauteren M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 May; 182(5):1340-2. PubMed ID: 15100142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. MR ductography: comparison with conventional ductography as a diagnostic method in patients with nipple discharge.
Hirose M; Nobusawa H; Gokan T
Radiographics; 2007 Oct; 27 Suppl 1():S183-96. PubMed ID: 18180226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Value of ductal obstruction sign in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions at MR imaging.
Baltzer PA; Kaiser CG; Dietzel M; Vag T; Herzog AB; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Aug; 75(2):e18-21. PubMed ID: 19954911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The value of clinical characteristics and breast-imaging studies in predicting a histopathologic diagnosis of cancer or high-risk lesion in patients with spontaneous nipple discharge.
Adepoju LJ; Chun J; El-Tamer M; Ditkoff BA; Schnabel F; Joseph KA
Am J Surg; 2005 Oct; 190(4):644-6. PubMed ID: 16164940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microdochectomy for single-duct pathologic nipple discharge and normal or benign imaging and cytology.
Lanitis S; Filippakis G; Thomas J; Christofides T; Al Mufti R; Hadjiminas DJ
Breast; 2008 Jun; 17(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 18207405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Preoperative marking of non-palpable mammary lesions on the magnetic resonance image using a body coil].
Sittek H; Perlet C; Helmberger T; Kolem H; Kessler M; Reiser M
Rontgenpraxis; 1998; 51(10):379-84. PubMed ID: 9885539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Atlas of breast magnetic resonance imaging.
Hirose M; Hashizume T; Seino N; Kubota H; Nobusawa H; Gokan T
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2007; 36(2):51-65. PubMed ID: 17331837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mammary ductoscopy: current status and future prospects.
Mokbel K; Escobar PF; Matsunaga T
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2005 Feb; 31(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 15642418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High-resolution MRI in detecting subareolar breast abscess.
Fu P; Kurihara Y; Kanemaki Y; Okamoto K; Nakajima Y; Fukuda M; Maeda I
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jun; 188(6):1568-72. PubMed ID: 17515378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of breast cancer with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging combined with magnetization transfer contrast using a newly developed breast surface coil for the supine position.
Shimada M; Senoo A; Hayashi S; Moriya H; Nanba T; Kogure T; Nakayama H; Nakagome M; Ito K; Kaneko I; Tsubuku M
Radiat Med; 1997; 15(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 9192432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Quantitative dynamic contrast breast-MRI with the 0.5 tesla equipment].
Klengel S; Hietschold V; Schreiber M; Köhler K
Rontgenpraxis; 1994 Aug; 47(8):223-8. PubMed ID: 7974011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Magnetic resonance of the breast. Clinical experience with a dedicated coil].
Beomonte Zobel B; Testa A; Tella S; Masciocchi C; Gallucci M; Ciccozzi A; Ventura T; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 1988 Sep; 76(3):146-51. PubMed ID: 2845488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Plain MR imaging of breast lesions: a study using 3 mm slice thickness].
Kumagai H; Ito H; Hashimoto S
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Jul; 53(7):801-5. PubMed ID: 8378140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammary ductoscopy for evaluation of nipple discharge.
Kapenhas-Valdes E; Feldman SM; Cohen JM; Boolbol SK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2720-7. PubMed ID: 18685898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ductoscopy and intraductal vacuum assisted biopsy in women with pathologic nipple discharge.
Hünerbein M; Raubach M; Gebauer B; Schneider W; Schlag PM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Oct; 99(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 16752074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetic resonance mammography in small vs. advanced breast lesions - systematic comparison reveals significant impact of lesion size on diagnostic accuracy in 936 histologically verified breast lesions.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gröschel T; Richter C; Burmeister H; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2011 Feb; 183(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 20830650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ductoscopy--increasing clinical utility.
Dooley WC
Breast J; 2009; 15(4):327-8. PubMed ID: 19508329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Autofluorescence ductoscopy: a new imaging technique for intraductal breast endoscopy.
Jacobs VR; Paepke S; Schaaf H; Weber BC; Kiechle-Bahat M
Clin Breast Cancer; 2007 Jun; 7(8):619-23. PubMed ID: 17592674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Who should have breast magnetic resonance imaging evaluation?
Orel S
J Clin Oncol; 2008 Feb; 26(5):703-11. PubMed ID: 18258977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. External herniation of a subareolar intraductal papilloma: a rare, yet beneficial, complication of conventional ductography.
Ginat DT; Sahler LG; Siddall KA
Clin Radiol; 2009 Dec; 64(12):1238-40. PubMed ID: 19913136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
