These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1510043)

  • 41. Comparison of arch dimension changes in 1-phase vs 2-phase treatment of Class II malocclusion.
    Wortham JR; Dolce C; McGorray SP; Le H; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 19577150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment.
    Dolce C; McGorray SP; Brazeau L; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17920501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Cervical and oblique headgear: a comparison of treatment effects.
    O'Reilly MT; Nanda SK; Close J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Jun; 103(6):504-9. PubMed ID: 8506811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Quantitative analysis of the orthodontic and orthopedic effects of maxillary traction.
    Baumrind S; Korn EL; Isaacson RJ; West EE; Molthen R
    Am J Orthod; 1983 Nov; 84(5):384-98. PubMed ID: 6579840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparison of 2 modifications of the twin-block appliance in matched Class II samples.
    Parkin NA; McKeown HF; Sandler PJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jun; 119(6):572-7. PubMed ID: 11395699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Stalpers MJ; Booij JW; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Katsaros C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 17826599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
    Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of the zygoma anchorage system with cervical headgear in buccal segment distalization.
    Kaya B; Arman A; Uçkan S; Yazici AC
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 19509344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Cervical headgear vs pendulum appliance for the treatment of moderate skeletal Class II malocclusion.
    Mossaz CF; Byloff FK; Kiliaridis S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):616-23. PubMed ID: 18005835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Cephalometric comparison of maxillary second molar extraction and nonextraction treatments in patients with Class II malocclusions.
    Waters D; Harris EF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Dec; 120(6):608-13; quiz 677. PubMed ID: 11742305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Camouflage of moderate Class III malocclusions with extraction of lower second molars and mandibular cervical headgear.
    Mora DR; Oberti G; Ealo M; Baccetti T
    Prog Orthod; 2007; 8(2):300-7. PubMed ID: 18030376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Cephalometric assessment of vertical control in the treatment of class II malocclusion with a combined maxillary splint.
    Garbui IU; Nouer PR; Nouer DF; Magnani MB; Pereira Neto JS
    Braz Oral Res; 2010; 24(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 20339711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Class II: a comparison of activator and activator headgear combination appliances.
    Oztürk Y; Tankuter N
    Eur J Orthod; 1994 Apr; 16(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 8005202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Treatment and posttreatment changes with combined headgear therapy.
    Tortop T; Yüksel S
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Sep; 77(5):857-63. PubMed ID: 17685765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Distalization of maxillary molars using the speed system: a clinical and radiological evaluation.
    Garino F; Garino GB
    World J Orthod; 2004; 5(4):317-23. PubMed ID: 15633378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Timing of cervical headgear treatment based on skeletal maturation.
    Kopecky GR; Fishman LS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Aug; 104(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 8338069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Dental and skeletal effects of combined headgear used alone or in association with rapid maxillary expansion.
    Farret MM; Lima EM; Farret MM; Araújo LL
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015 Oct; 20(5):43-9. PubMed ID: 26560820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Cervical headgear effectiveness in distalizing molars in relation to patient compliance.
    Gratsia S; Cocos A; Vastardis H; Halazonetis D
    Eur J Orthod; 2024 Jan; 46(1):. PubMed ID: 38128567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A cephalometric evaluation of high-pull molar headgear and face-bow neck strap therapy.
    Brown P
    Am J Orthod; 1978 Dec; 74(6):621-32. PubMed ID: 281872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Age effects on orthodontic treatment: adolescents contrasted with adults.
    Dyer GS; Harris EF; Vaden JL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Dec; 100(6):523-30. PubMed ID: 1962605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.