These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15101251)

  • 1. [The radiologist is a clinical consultant, not a photographer].
    Aspelin P
    Lakartidningen; 2004 Mar; 101(13):1228. PubMed ID: 15101251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The radiologist and the golden standard of triple diagnostics--who is responsible?].
    Lakartidningen; 2004 Mar; 101(10):930-1. PubMed ID: 15055059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When the patient asks for the results of her mammogram, how should the radiologist reply?
    Hoffman NY; Janus J; Destounis S; Logan-Young W
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):597-9. PubMed ID: 8109504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Physician-to-physician communication.
    Avery JK
    J Tenn Med Assoc; 1994 Nov; 87(11):482-3. PubMed ID: 7983866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Concerning radiologists reported to the HSAN--is everything unclear to be punctured?].
    Gullsby S
    Lakartidningen; 2004 May; 101(19):1745. PubMed ID: 15188597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Should a radiologist be a referring physician?
    Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Mar; 196(3):W349. PubMed ID: 21343488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The experiences of a hospital radiology department with outside referrals for the preoperative marking of suspicious breast lesions].
    Helbich TH; Mostbeck GH; Zontsich T; Heinz-Peer G; Cervenka P; Wohlschlager H; Fitzal P; Wolf G
    Rofo; 1995 Jun; 162(6):492-6. PubMed ID: 7605961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The current state of the diagnostics of breast diseases in Lombardy].
    Vergnaghi D; Panizza P; Gozzi G
    Radiol Med; 2000 Nov; 100(5):314-20. PubMed ID: 11213407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Introduction of additional double reading of mammograms by radiographers: effects on a biennial screening programme outcome.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; van Ineveld BM; Roumen RM; de Koning HJ
    Eur J Cancer; 2008 Jun; 44(9):1223-8. PubMed ID: 18400488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Women's attitudes about receiving mammographic results directly from radiologists.
    Liu S; Bassett LW; Sayre J
    Radiology; 1994 Dec; 193(3):783-6. PubMed ID: 7972824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiologist as consultant: direct contact between referring clinician and radiologist before CT examination.
    Seltzer SE; Beard JO; Adams DF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Apr; 144(4):661-4. PubMed ID: 3872018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The self-referred mammography patient: a new responsibility for radiologists.
    Monsees B; Destouet JM; Evens RG
    Radiology; 1988 Jan; 166(1 Pt 1):69-70. PubMed ID: 3336703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mammography: will adequate manpower exist?
    D'Orsi CJ
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2004 Sep; 42(5):975-8, viii. PubMed ID: 15337429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Diagnostic difficulties in mammography].
    Mazy G; Jeanmart L
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1975; 4 SUPPL 2():183-7. PubMed ID: 1194637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast imaging: current utilization, trends, and implications.
    Bassett LW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):612-3. PubMed ID: 17715107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Legal liability of the radiologist in missed breast cancer diagnosis].
    Mortier M; Villeirs G
    JBR-BTR; 2003; 86(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 12693376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A surgeon wishes to schedule a woman for wire localization of a nonpalpable breast lesion.
    Eklund GW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1293-4. PubMed ID: 7717253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mammography in the diagnosis of breast carcinoma: an evaluation of direct referral facilities for family practitioners.
    Price JL; Davies PM
    Br J Radiol; 1977 Feb; 50(590):116-8. PubMed ID: 831929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The mammography report.
    Schorr RT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Dec; 147(6):1332-3. PubMed ID: 3490777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.