These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15101426)

  • 1. In support of null hypothesis significance testing.
    Mogie M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Feb; 271 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S82-4. PubMed ID: 15101426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The harm done by tests of significance.
    Hauer E
    Accid Anal Prev; 2004 May; 36(3):495-500. PubMed ID: 15003595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The continuing misuse of null hypothesis significance testing in biological anthropology.
    Smith RJ
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2018 May; 166(1):236-245. PubMed ID: 29345299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistics in ophthalmology revisited: the (effect) size matters.
    Grzybowski A; Mianowany M
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 96(7):e885-e888. PubMed ID: 30187631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating statistical difference, equivalence, and indeterminacy using inferential confidence intervals: an integrated alternative method of conducting null hypothesis statistical tests.
    Tryon WW
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):371-86. PubMed ID: 11778678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The researcher and the consultant: a dialogue on null hypothesis significance testing.
    Stang A; Poole C
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2013 Dec; 28(12):939-44. PubMed ID: 24233192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Moving Beyond p < 0.05 in Ecotoxicology: A Guide for Practitioners.
    Erickson RA; Rattner BA
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2020 Sep; 39(9):1657-1669. PubMed ID: 32539165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A review of issues about null hypothesis Bayesian testing.
    Tendeiro JN; Kiers HAL
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Dec; 24(6):774-795. PubMed ID: 31094544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why checking model assumptions using null hypothesis significance tests does not suffice: A plea for plausibility.
    Tijmstra J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Apr; 25(2):548-559. PubMed ID: 29476482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On confidence intervals for within-subjects designs.
    Blouin DC; Riopelle AJ
    Psychol Methods; 2005 Dec; 10(4):397-412. PubMed ID: 16392995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Null hypothesis significance testing: a review of an old and continuing controversy.
    Nickerson RS
    Psychol Methods; 2000 Jun; 5(2):241-301. PubMed ID: 10937333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Calculating the main alternatives to null-hypothesis-significance testing in between-subject experimental designs.
    Balluerka Lasa N; Vergara Iraeta AI; Arnau Gras J
    Psicothema; 2009 Feb; 21(1):141-51. PubMed ID: 19178869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Extracting a maximum of useful information from statistical research data.
    Sohlberg S; Andersson G
    Scand J Psychol; 2005 Feb; 46(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 15660635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A logical analysis of null hypothesis significance testing using popular terminology.
    McNulty R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Sep; 22(1):244. PubMed ID: 36123631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The null hypothesis significance test in health sciences research (1995-2006): statistical analysis and interpretation.
    Silva-Ayçaguer LC; Suárez-Gil P; Fernández-Somoano A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 May; 10():44. PubMed ID: 20482841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neuroscience Needs to Test Both Statistical and Scientific Hypotheses.
    Alger BE
    J Neurosci; 2022 Nov; 42(45):8432-8438. PubMed ID: 36351823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Guide for calculating and interpreting effect sizes and confidence intervals in intellectual and developmental disability research studies.
    Dunst CJ; Hamby DW
    J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2012 Jun; 37(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 22530580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Error Rates, Decisive Outcomes and Publication Bias with Several Inferential Methods.
    Hopkins WG; Batterham AM
    Sports Med; 2016 Oct; 46(10):1563-73. PubMed ID: 26971328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals.
    Hoekstra R; Morey RD; Rouder JN; Wagenmakers EJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Oct; 21(5):1157-64. PubMed ID: 24420726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. P > .05: The incorrect interpretation of "not significant" results is a significant problem.
    Smith RJ
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2020 Aug; 172(4):521-527. PubMed ID: 32570289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.