These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15101644)

  • 1. Bandwidth of spectral resolution for two-formant synthetic vowels and two-tone complex signals.
    Xu Q; Jacewicz E; Feth LL; Krishnamurthy AK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Apr; 115(4):1653-64. PubMed ID: 15101644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The perception of back vowels: centre of gravity hypothesis.
    Assmann PF
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Aug; 43(3):423-48. PubMed ID: 1775650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of spectral prominence on perceived vowel quality.
    Beddor PS; Hawkins S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jun; 87(6):2684-704. PubMed ID: 2373803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory spectral integration in the perception of static vowels.
    Fox RA; Jacewicz E; Chang CY
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 54(6):1667-81. PubMed ID: 21862680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Formant-frequency matching between sounds with different bandwidths and on different fundamental frequencies.
    Dissard P; Darwin CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jul; 110(1):409-15. PubMed ID: 11508966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual separation of simultaneous vowels: within and across-formant grouping by F0.
    Culling JF; Darwin CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jun; 93(6):3454-67. PubMed ID: 8326071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels.
    Syrdal AK; Gopal HS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Apr; 79(4):1086-100. PubMed ID: 3700864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Formant-frequency discrimination for isolated English vowels.
    Kewley-Port D; Watson CS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jan; 95(1):485-96. PubMed ID: 8120259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relative importance of spectral tilt in monophthongs and diphthongs.
    Kiefte M; Kluender KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1395-404. PubMed ID: 15807027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Absorption of reliable spectral characteristics in auditory perception.
    Kiefte M; Kluender KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):366-76. PubMed ID: 18177166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Formant-frequency discrimination of synthesized vowels in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and humans.
    Henry KS; Amburgey KN; Abrams KS; Idrobo F; Carney LH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):2073. PubMed ID: 29092534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Coherence masking protection in speech sounds: the role of formant synchrony.
    Gordon PC
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Feb; 59(2):232-42. PubMed ID: 9055618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vowel formant discrimination for high-fidelity speech.
    Liu C; Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1224-33. PubMed ID: 15376687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Topographic and temporal indices of vowel spectral envelope extraction in the human auditory cortex.
    Diesch E; Luce T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2000 Sep; 12(5):878-93. PubMed ID: 11054929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimum spectral contrast for vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Leek MR; Dorman MF; Summerfield Q
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jan; 81(1):148-54. PubMed ID: 3819173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perception of vowels with missing formant peaks.
    Nenadić F; Coulter P; Nearey TM; Kiefte M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Oct; 148(4):1911. PubMed ID: 33138491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of spectral cues in timbre discrimination by ferrets and humans.
    Town SM; Atilgan H; Wood KC; Bizley JK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2870-83. PubMed ID: 25994714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vowel formant discrimination II: Effects of stimulus uncertainty, consonantal context, and training.
    Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2141-55. PubMed ID: 11681391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Segregation of concurrent sounds. II: Effects of spectral envelope tracing, frequency modulation coherence, and frequency modulation width.
    Marin CM; McAdams S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jan; 89(1):341-51. PubMed ID: 2002173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech enhancement for listeners with hearing loss based on a model for vowel coding in the auditory midbrain.
    Rao A; Carney LH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Jul; 61(7):2081-91. PubMed ID: 24686228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.