194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15102865)
1. Evaluation of methods for improving precision of blood pressure measurements in phase I clinical trials.
Terra SG; Blum RA; Wei GC; Lew RA; Digenio AG; Rajman I; Kazierad DJ
J Clin Pharmacol; 2004 May; 44(5):457-63. PubMed ID: 15102865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated versus manual blood pressure measurement: a randomized crossover trial.
Heinemann M; Sellick K; Rickard C; Reynolds P; McGrail M
Int J Nurs Pract; 2008 Aug; 14(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 18715391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of the HEM-780REL with easy wrap cuff for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol.
Viera AJ; Hinderliter AL
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):335-8. PubMed ID: 17890973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of two sphygmomanometers that may replace the traditional mercury column in the healthcare workplace.
Elliott WJ; Young PE; DeVivo L; Feldstein J; Black HR
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17303984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison between an automated and manual sphygmomanometer in a population survey.
Myers MG; McInnis NH; Fodor GJ; Leenen FH
Am J Hypertens; 2008 Mar; 21(3):280-3. PubMed ID: 18219304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Algorithms for converting random-zero to automated oscillometric blood pressure values, and vice versa.
Stang A; Moebus S; Möhlenkamp S; Dragano N; Schmermund A; Beck EM; Siegrist J; Erbel R; Jöckel KH;
Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Jul; 164(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 16675536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Automated and Mercury Column Blood Pressure Measurements in Health Care Settings.
Pavlik VN; Hyman DJ; Toronjo C
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2000 Mar; 2(2):81-86. PubMed ID: 11416630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The trained observer better predicts daytime ABPM diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients than does an automated (Omron) device.
Graves JW; Grossardt BR; Gullerud RE; Bailey KR; Feldstein J
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 16534405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of the Microlife WatchBP Home device for self home blood pressure measurement according to the International Protocol.
Stergiou GS; Giovas PP; Gkinos CP; Patouras JD
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 17496469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimum frequency of office blood pressure measurement using an automated sphygmomanometer.
Myers MG; Valdivieso M; Kiss A
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Dec; 13(6):333-8. PubMed ID: 19020423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of noninvasive blood pressure measurements in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Anastas ZM; Jimerson E; Garolis S
J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2008; 23(6):519-24; quiz 525-6. PubMed ID: 18953216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an oscillometric device for monitoring blood pressure in dialysis patients.
Lodi CA; Estridge C; Ghidini C
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2950-61. PubMed ID: 17556423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of two automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension: the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) and the Omron R7 (HEM 637-IT).
Topouchian JA; El Assaad MA; Orobinskaia LV; El Feghali RN; Asmar RG
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Jun; 11(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 16702826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of automated blood pressure measurements in clinical trials and registration studies: data from the VALTOP Study.
Mengden T; Asmar R; Kandra A; Di Giovanni R; Brudi P; Parati G
Blood Press Monit; 2010 Aug; 15(4):188-94. PubMed ID: 20543666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of the Microlife BPA100 Plus device for self-home blood pressure measurement according to the International Protocol.
Stergiou GS; Giovas PP; Neofytou MS; Adamopoulos DN
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Jun; 11(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 16702824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of the Artsana CSI 610 automated blood pressure monitor in adults according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
Pini C; Pastori M; Baccheschi J; Omboni S; Parati G;
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 17496468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Contribution of automatic sphygmomanometers for one-time measurement of blood pressure].
Slabý A; Josífko M
Cas Lek Cesk; 1990 Aug; 129(35):1107-10. PubMed ID: 2224970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Increase in blood pressure reproducibility by repeated semi-automatic blood pressure measurements in the clinic environment.
Mancia G; Ulian L; Parati G; Trazzi S
J Hypertens; 1994 Apr; 12(4):469-73. PubMed ID: 8064172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of the OMRON M7 (HEM-780-E) blood pressure measuring device in a population requiring large cuff use according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
El Feghali RN; Topouchian JA; Pannier BM; El Assaad HA; Asmar RG;
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 17496467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
