293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15103337)
1. Health department lays down the law on scientific misconduct.
Wadman M
Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6985):786. PubMed ID: 15103337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Due process in investigations of research misconduct.
Mello MM; Brennan TA
N Engl J Med; 2003 Sep; 349(13):1280-6. PubMed ID: 14507953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Misconduct? It's all academic..
Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7125):240-1. PubMed ID: 17230159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Both accused researchers and whistle-blowers stay anonymous when no misconduct is found.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2005 Jul; 20(7):8. PubMed ID: 16270443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct.
Sovacool BK
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):W1-7. PubMed ID: 16179287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Privacy of researchers versus public's right to know their names.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2005 May; 20(5):8. PubMed ID: 16175715
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Repairing research integrity.
Titus SL; Wells JA; Rhoades LJ
Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7198):980-2. PubMed ID: 18563131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. HHS proposes revised regulations on misconduct in research.
Shalev M
Lab Anim (NY); 2004 Jun; 33(6):12-3. PubMed ID: 15179427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. US free-speech law offers protection--at a price.
Samuel Reich E
Nature; 2011 Mar; 471(7338):276-7. PubMed ID: 21412304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Whistles blow in vain on bad practice in German research.
Abbott A
Nature; 2003 Nov; 426(6964):218. PubMed ID: 14628012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Hostile reception to US misconduct report.
Wadman M
Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6584):639. PubMed ID: 8649502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Solutions, not scapegoats.
Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7198):957. PubMed ID: 18563095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Animal welfare and scientific misconduct: reviewing, investigating, and reporting violations and concerns.
Shalev M
Lab Anim (NY); 2002 May; 31(5):17-8. PubMed ID: 11984546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospect of stricter timekeeping alarms US biologists.
Marris E
Nature; 2005 Dec; 438(7069):721. PubMed ID: 16340976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Need for a court to rule on patents and misconduct.
Bihain BE
Nature; 2003 Aug; 424(6951):875. PubMed ID: 12931157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Regulation of scientific misconduct in federally funded research.
Steinberg NA
South Calif Interdiscip Law J; 2000; 10(1):39-105. PubMed ID: 12953675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Japan ponders steps to probe data errors.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2002 Nov; 420(6914):348. PubMed ID: 12459746
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethics and fraud.
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):117-8. PubMed ID: 16407910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Spring helps research integrity report resurface.
Marwick C
JAMA; 1996 Mar; 275(10):746. PubMed ID: 8598578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Sitting in judgement.
Check E
Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6905):332-3. PubMed ID: 12353003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
