These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15104304)

  • 1. The prognostic significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Mosse CA; Magi-Galluzzi C; Tsuzuki T; Epstein JI
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2004 Mar; 28(3):394-8. PubMed ID: 15104304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The prognostic significance of tertiary Gleason patterns of higher grade in radical prostatectomy specimens: a proposal to modify the Gleason grading system.
    Pan CC; Potter SR; Partin AW; Epstein JI
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2000 Apr; 24(4):563-9. PubMed ID: 10757404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 is a powerful predictor of biochemical relapse in patients with Gleason score 7 prostatic adenocarcinoma.
    Hattab EM; Koch MO; Eble JN; Lin H; Cheng L
    J Urol; 2006 May; 175(5):1695-9; discussion 1699. PubMed ID: 16600733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A pathological reassessment of organ-confined, Gleason score 6 prostatic adenocarcinomas that progress after radical prostatectomy.
    Miyamoto H; Hernandez DJ; Epstein JI
    Hum Pathol; 2009 Dec; 40(12):1693-8. PubMed ID: 19683331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Presence of high grade tertiary Gleason pattern upgrades the Gleason sum score and is inversely associated with biochemical recurrence-free survival.
    Turker P; Bas E; Bozkurt S; Günlüsoy B; Sezgin A; Postacı H; Turkeri L
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Jan; 31(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 21316989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in Gleason score 7 radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Whittemore DE; Hick EJ; Carter MR; Moul JW; Miranda-Sousa AJ; Sexton WJ
    J Urol; 2008 Feb; 179(2):516-22; discussion 522. PubMed ID: 18076949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pathologic stage of prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma at radical prostatectomy: effect of percentage of the ductal component and associated grade of acinar adenocarcinoma.
    Amin A; Epstein JI
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Apr; 35(4):615-9. PubMed ID: 21383610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gleason grading of prostatic needle biopsies. Correlation with grade in 316 matched prostatectomies.
    Bostwick DG
    Am J Surg Pathol; 1994 Aug; 18(8):796-803. PubMed ID: 8037294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pathological parameters of radical prostatectomy for clinical stages T1c versus T2 prostate adenocarcinoma: decreased pathological stage and increased detection of transition zone tumors.
    Jack GS; Cookson MS; Coffey CS; Vader V; Roberts RL; Chang SS; Smith JA; Shappell SB
    J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):519-24. PubMed ID: 12131301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlation of the primary Gleason pattern on prostate needle biopsy with clinico-pathological factors in Gleason 7 tumors.
    Grober ED; Tsihlias J; Jewett MA; Sweet JM; Evans AJ; Trachtenberg J; Robinette M; Nam RK
    Can J Urol; 2004 Feb; 11(1):2157-62. PubMed ID: 15003158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does the tertiary Gleason pattern influence the PSA progression-free interval after retropubic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer?
    van Oort IM; Schout BM; Kiemeney LA; Hulsbergen CA; Witjes JA
    Eur Urol; 2005 Oct; 48(4):572-6. PubMed ID: 16046051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of outcome after radical prostatectomy in men with organ-confined Gleason score 8 to 10 adenocarcinoma.
    Rioux-Leclercq NC; Chan DY; Epstein JI
    Urology; 2002 Oct; 60(4):666-9. PubMed ID: 12385930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Should each core with prostate cancer be assigned a separate gleason score?
    Kunz GM; Epstein JI
    Hum Pathol; 2003 Sep; 34(9):911-4. PubMed ID: 14562287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
    Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prognostic significance of paneth cell-like neuroendocrine differentiation in adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
    Tamas EF; Epstein JI
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Aug; 30(8):980-5. PubMed ID: 16861969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A tertiary Gleason pattern in the prostatectomy specimen and its association with adverse outcome after radical prostatectomy.
    Adam M; Hannah A; Budäus L; Steuber T; Salomon G; Michl U; Haese A; Fisch M; Wittmer C; Steurer S; Minner S; Heinzer H; Huland H; Graefen M; Sauter G; Schlomm T; Isbarn H
    J Urol; 2014 Jul; 192(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 24518778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Should a Gleason score be assigned to a minute focus of carcinoma on prostate biopsy?
    Rubin MA; Dunn R; Kambham N; Misick CP; O'Toole KM
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2000 Dec; 24(12):1634-40. PubMed ID: 11117784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic significance of Gleason score 3+4 versus Gleason score 4+3 tumor at radical prostatectomy.
    Chan TY; Partin AW; Walsh PC; Epstein JI
    Urology; 2000 Nov; 56(5):823-7. PubMed ID: 11068310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prognostic influence of the third Gleason grade in prostatectomy specimens.
    Cedeño Díaz OM; Fernández Aceñero MJ; Alvarez Fernández E
    Urol Oncol; 2012; 30(4):386-90. PubMed ID: 21292510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The value of the modified Gleason grading system of prostate adenocarcinoma in routine urological diagnostics].
    Helpap B; Egevad L
    Urologe A; 2007 Jan; 46(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 17111167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.