These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15104324)
61. Comparison of organ dosimetry methods and effective dose calculation methods for paediatric CT. Brady Z; Cain TM; Johnston PN Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2012 Jun; 35(2):117-34. PubMed ID: 22492218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. How to Appropriately Calculate Effective Dose for CT Using Either Size-Specific Dose Estimates or Dose-Length Product. Brady SL; Mirro AE; Moore BM; Kaufman RA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 May; 204(5):953-8. PubMed ID: 25729893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Organ and effective doses in infants undergoing upper gastrointestinal (UGI) fluoroscopic examination. Staton RJ; Williams JL; Arreola MM; Hintenlang DE; Bolch WE Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):703-10. PubMed ID: 17388188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Local diagnostic reference levels in standard X-ray examinations. Compagnone G; Pagan L; Bergamini C Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 15572400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Examination frequency and population dose from medical X-ray examinations in Sudan in 2010. Suliman II; Ibraheem SB; Youssif BE; Abdelgabar MI; Gafar R; Elshiekh E; Ahmed NA; Sulieman A Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):141-5. PubMed ID: 25836683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Transition from screen-film to computed radiography in a paediatric hospital: the missing link towards optimisation. Paulo G; Santos J; Moreira A; Figueiredo F Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):164-7. PubMed ID: 21816730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Estimation of adult patient doses for common diagnostic X-ray examinations in Wad-madani, Sudan: derivation of local diagnostic reference levels. Suliman II; Mohammedzein TS Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2014 Jun; 37(2):425-9. PubMed ID: 24584663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part II: Occupational exposure. Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Debaveye D; Bogaerts R; Verlinden S; Sanderink G Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 15897285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Survey of radiological techniques and doses of children undergoing some common x-ray examinations in three hospitals in Nigeria. Ogundare FO; Ajibola CL; Balogun FA Med Phys; 2004 Mar; 31(3):521-4. PubMed ID: 15070249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Establishment of diagnostic reference levels in computed tomography for paediatric patients in Sudan: a pilot study. Sulieman A Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):91-4. PubMed ID: 25836694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Patient size and x-ray transmission in body CT. Ogden K; Huda W; Scalzetti EM; Roskopf ML Health Phys; 2004 Apr; 86(4):397-405. PubMed ID: 15057061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. PAEDIATRIC CT EXPOSURE PRACTICE IN THE COUNTY OF RIO DE JANEIRO: THE NEED TO ESTABLISH DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS. de Jesus FM; Magalhães LA; Kodlulovich S Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Nov; 171(3):389-397. PubMed ID: 26410769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Establishment of local diagnostic reference levels in paediatric screen-film radiography at a children's hospital. Wambani JS; Korir GK; Korir IK; Kilaha S Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 May; 154(4):465-76. PubMed ID: 23091220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]