These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

388 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15104606)

  • 1. A randomised comparison of oral misoprostol and vaginal prostaglandin E2 tablets in labour induction at term.
    Shetty A; Livingstone I; Acharya S; Rice P; Danielian P; Templeton A
    BJOG; 2004 May; 111(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 15104606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of oral misoprostol tablets and vaginal prostaglandin E2 pessary in induction of labour at term.
    Hassan AA
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 May; 15(5):284-7. PubMed ID: 15907239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a more effective agent than prostaglandin F2 alpha gel and prostaglandin E2 pessary.
    Majoko F; Zwizwai M; Nyström L; Lindmark G
    Cent Afr J Med; 2002; 48(11-12):123-8. PubMed ID: 14562597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomised controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal gel for inducing labour at term.
    Gregson S; Waterstone M; Norman I; Murrells T
    BJOG; 2005 Apr; 112(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 15777441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.
    Paungmora N; Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Punyavachira P
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15327448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of vaginal misoprostol tablets and prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labor in premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized comparative trial.
    Chaudhuri S; Mitra SN; Banerjee PK; Biswas PK; Bhattacharyya S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1564-71. PubMed ID: 21676083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.
    Calder AA; Loughney AD; Weir CJ; Barber JW
    BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomised controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour induction.
    Prager M; Eneroth-Grimfors E; Edlund M; Marions L
    BJOG; 2008 Oct; 115(11):1443-50. PubMed ID: 18715244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Oral misoprostol vs. intravaginal prostaglandin E2 for preinduction cervical ripening. A randomized trial.
    Gherman RB; Browning J; O'Boyle A; Goodwin TM
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Jul; 46(7):641-6. PubMed ID: 11499184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of various routes and dosages of misoprostol for cervical ripening and the induction of labor.
    How HY; Leaseburge L; Khoury JC; Siddiqi TA; Spinnato JA; Sibai BM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):911-5. PubMed ID: 11641677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sublingual compared with vaginal misoprostol for labour induction at term: a randomised controlled trial.
    Bartusevicius A; Barcaite E; Krikstolaitis R; Gintautas V; Nadisauskiene R
    BJOG; 2006 Dec; 113(12):1431-7. PubMed ID: 17083652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Safety and efficacy of oral versus vaginal misoprostol use for induction of labour at term.
    Abbassi RM; Sirichand P; Rizvi S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Oct; 18(10):625-9. PubMed ID: 18940120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel.
    Danielian P; Porter B; Ferri N; Summers J; Templeton A
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):793-7. PubMed ID: 10453828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Induction of labour with intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel: a comparative study.
    Nanda S; Singhal SR; Papneja A
    Trop Doct; 2007 Jan; 37(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 17326881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Oral misoprostol against vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a randomized comparison].
    Henrich W; Dudenhausen JW; Hanel C; Chen FC
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2008 Oct; 212(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 18956276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel versus tablet in the induction of labour at term--a retrospective analysis.
    Shetty A; Livingston I; Acharya S; Templeton A
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Apr; 24(3):243-6. PubMed ID: 15203616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prospective randomised controlled trial to compare safety and efficacy of intravaginal Misoprostol with intracervical Cerviprime for induction of labour with unfavourable cervix.
    Krithika KS; Aggarwal N; Suri V
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Apr; 28(3):294-7. PubMed ID: 18569471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vaginal misoprostol in managing premature rupture of membranes.
    Ayad IA
    East Mediterr Health J; 2002; 8(4-5):515-20. PubMed ID: 15603033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.