These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15105329)

  • 1. Integrating qualitative research with trials in systematic reviews.
    Thomas J; Harden A; Oakley A; Oliver S; Sutcliffe K; Rees R; Brunton G; Kavanagh J
    BMJ; 2004 Apr; 328(7446):1010-2. PubMed ID: 15105329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Qualitative methods: systematic reviews in qualitative health-care research as a basis for evidence-based practice].
    Hasseler M
    Gesundheitswesen; 2007 May; 69(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 17582547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Searching the biomedical literature: research study designs and critical appraisal.
    Callas PW
    Clin Lab Sci; 2008; 21(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18335861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses)].
    Walther S; Schuetz GM; Hamm B; Dewey M
    Rofo; 2011 Dec; 183(12):1106-10. PubMed ID: 22144064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meta-analyses of small numbers of trials often agree with longer-term results.
    Herbison P; Hay-Smith J; Gillespie WJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Feb; 64(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 20609563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meta-analysis in medical research: potentials and limitations.
    Zwahlen M; Renehan A; Egger M
    Urol Oncol; 2008; 26(3):320-9. PubMed ID: 18452828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of systematic reviews in clinical research and practice.
    Haines T; McKnight L; Duku E; Perry L; Thoma A
    Clin Plast Surg; 2008 Apr; 35(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 18298993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. More than the sum of its parts: meta-analysis and its potential to discover sources of heterogeneity in psychosomatic medicine.
    Tak LM; Meijer A; Manoharan A; de Jonge P; Rosmalen JG
    Psychosom Med; 2010 Apr; 72(3):253-65. PubMed ID: 20395625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can you see the wood for the trees? Making sense of forest plots in systematic reviews 2. Analysis of the combined results from the included studies.
    Hyde CJ; Stanworth SJ; Murphy MF
    Transfusion; 2008 Apr; 48(4):580-3. PubMed ID: 18194387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the new age of transparency.
    Honig PK
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Aug; 88(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 20648031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic reviews: toward best practice in patient care.
    Holly C
    Heart Lung; 2012; 41(2):103-4. PubMed ID: 22364912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of systematic reviews and meta-analysis in dermatology.
    Abuabara K; Freeman EE; Dellavalle R
    J Invest Dermatol; 2012 Nov; 132(11):e2. PubMed ID: 23069910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advancing research through systematic reviews and meta-analysis: workshop experience.
    Alam AY; Zaidi Z; Rahim F; Qureshi AA
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 May; 18(5):323-4. PubMed ID: 18541096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attention should be given to multiplicity issues in systematic reviews.
    Bender R; Bunce C; Clarke M; Gates S; Lange S; Pace NL; Thorlund K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 61(9):857-65. PubMed ID: 18687287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Montori VM; Swiontkowski MF; Cook DJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Aug; (413):43-54. PubMed ID: 12897595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence-based medicine: revisiting the pyramid of priorities.
    Rosner AL
    J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2012 Jan; 16(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 22196426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical considerations in meta-analysis.
    Barza M; Trikalinos TA; Lau J
    Infect Dis Clin North Am; 2009 Jun; 23(2):195-210, Table of Contents. PubMed ID: 19393905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The PRISMA Statement - what should be reported about systematic reviews?].
    Antes G; von Elm E
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2009 Aug; 134(33):1619. PubMed ID: 19650021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.