These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15105385)

  • 21. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2001 results from the Canadian ART Register.
    Gunby J; Daya S;
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Sep; 84(3):590-9. PubMed ID: 16169390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Overall prognosis with current treatment of infertility.
    Collins JA; Van Steirteghem A
    Hum Reprod Update; 2004; 10(4):309-16. PubMed ID: 15192058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: The cumulated singleton/twin delivery rates per oocyte pick-up: the CUSIDERA and CUTWIDERA.
    Germond M; Urner F; Chanson A; Primi MP; Wirthner D; Senn A
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Nov; 19(11):2442-4. PubMed ID: 15358719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Outcomes from assisted reproductive technology.
    Van Voorhis BJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jan; 107(1):183-200. PubMed ID: 16394060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis.
    Oktay K; Cil AP; Bang H
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Jul; 86(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 16818031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Does assisted reproduction technology, per se, increase the risk of preterm birth?
    Blickstein I
    BJOG; 2006 Dec; 113 Suppl 3():68-71. PubMed ID: 17206968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Register data on Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) in Europe including a detailed description of ART in Denmark.
    Nyboe Andersen A; Erb K
    Int J Androl; 2006 Feb; 29(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 16466519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.
    ;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Jun; 87(6):1253-66. PubMed ID: 17276436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Factors affecting low birthweight after assisted reproduction technology: difference between transfer of fresh and cryopreserved embryos suggests an adverse effect of oocyte collection.
    Shih W; Rushford DD; Bourne H; Garrett C; McBain JC; Healy DL; Baker HW
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Jul; 23(7):1644-53. PubMed ID: 18442997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Laser assisted hatching in good prognosis patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial.
    Sagoskin AW; Levy MJ; Tucker MJ; Richter KS; Widra EA
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Feb; 87(2):283-7. PubMed ID: 17094975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Multiple pregnancies after ART: problems and possible solutions].
    Shebl O; Ebner T; Sommergruber M; Sir A; Urdl W; Tews G
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2007; 47(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 17272931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The relative contribution of assisted reproductive technologies and ovulation induction to multiple births in the United States 5 years after the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine recommendation to limit the number of embryos transferred.
    Dickey RP
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Dec; 88(6):1554-61. PubMed ID: 17481621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A big first step.
    Jones HW
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Nov; 19(11):2445. PubMed ID: 15479704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Elective single embryo transfer with cryopreservation improves the outcome and diminishes the costs of IVF/ICSI.
    Veleva Z; Karinen P; Tomás C; Tapanainen JS; Martikainen H
    Hum Reprod; 2009 Jul; 24(7):1632-9. PubMed ID: 19318704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. New frontiers of assisted reproductive technology (Chien Tien Hsu Memorial Lecture 2007).
    Ho PC
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Feb; 35(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 19215541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assisted reproductive technology: both sides now.
    Cheung AP
    J Reprod Med; 2006 Apr; 51(4):283-92. PubMed ID: 16739266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Perinatal outcome of 12,021 singleton and 3108 twin births after non-IVF-assisted reproduction: a cohort study.
    Ombelet W; Martens G; De Sutter P; Gerris J; Bosmans E; Ruyssinck G; Defoort P; Molenberghs G; Gyselaers W
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Apr; 21(4):1025-32. PubMed ID: 16339165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Single embryo transfer in clinical practice.
    Hydén-Granskog C; Tiitinen A
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2004 Sep; 7(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 15590571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Babies born after ART treatment cost more than non-ART babies: a cost analysis of inpatient birth-admission costs of singleton and multiple gestation pregnancies.
    Chambers GM; Chapman MG; Grayson N; Shanahan M; Sullivan EA
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Dec; 22(12):3108-15. PubMed ID: 17905747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Success rates and cost of a live birth following fresh assisted reproduction treatment in women aged 45 years and older, Australia 2002-2004.
    Sullivan E; Wang Y; Chapman M; Chambers G
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Jul; 23(7):1639-43. PubMed ID: 18417497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.