These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15107007)

  • 1. Utility of pedometers for assessing physical activity: construct validity.
    Tudor-Locke C; Williams JE; Reis JP; Pluto D
    Sports Med; 2004; 34(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 15107007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Utility of pedometers for assessing physical activity: convergent validity.
    Tudor-Locke C; Williams JE; Reis JP; Pluto D
    Sports Med; 2002; 32(12):795-808. PubMed ID: 12238942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why do pedometers work?: a reflection upon the factors related to successfully increasing physical activity.
    Tudor-Locke C; Lutes L
    Sports Med; 2009; 39(12):981-93. PubMed ID: 19902981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of questionnaire, accelerometer, and pedometer: measures in older people.
    Harris TJ; Owen CG; Victor CR; Adams R; Ekelund U; Cook DG
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2009 Jul; 41(7):1392-402. PubMed ID: 19516162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring activity levels of young people: the validity of pedometers.
    McNamara E; Hudson Z; Taylor SJ
    Br Med Bull; 2010; 95():121-37. PubMed ID: 20562207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How many steps/day are enough? Preliminary pedometer indices for public health.
    Tudor-Locke C; Bassett DR
    Sports Med; 2004; 34(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 14715035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Several steps/day indicators predict changes in anthropometric outcomes: HUB City Steps.
    Thomson JL; Landry AS; Zoellner JM; Tudor-Locke C; Webster M; Connell C; Yadrick K
    BMC Public Health; 2012 Nov; 12():983. PubMed ID: 23153060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer measures of free-living physical activity.
    Tudor-Locke C; Ainsworth BE; Thompson RW; Matthews CE
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2002 Dec; 34(12):2045-51. PubMed ID: 12471314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pedometer-measured physical activity of adults with intellectual disability: predicting weekly step counts.
    Temple VA; Stanish HI
    Am J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2009 Jan; 114(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 19143459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of pedometers for monitoring physical activity in children and adolescents: measurement considerations.
    Clemes SA; Biddle SJ
    J Phys Act Health; 2013 Feb; 10(2):249-62. PubMed ID: 23407447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a commercially available pedometer used to promote physical activity as part of a national programme.
    Clemes SA; O'Connell S; Rogan LM; Griffiths PL
    Br J Sports Med; 2010 Dec; 44(16):1178-83. PubMed ID: 19474004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship between Specific Field-Based Physical Fitness Test Results and Selected Health Biomarkers in College-Aged Males: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Prieto-González P
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Nov; 19(21):. PubMed ID: 36361382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are Active Australia physical activity questions valid for older adults?
    Heesch KC; Hill RL; van Uffelen JG; Brown WJ
    J Sci Med Sport; 2011 May; 14(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 21276752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validity of pedometers in people with physical disabilities: a systematic review.
    Kenyon A; McEvoy M; Sprod J; Maher C
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Jun; 94(6):1161-70. PubMed ID: 23201318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Self-efficacy, physical activity, and aerobic fitness in middle school children: examination of a pedometer intervention program.
    Manley D; Cowan P; Graff C; Perlow M; Rice P; Richey P; Sanchez Z
    J Pediatr Nurs; 2014; 29(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 24263251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring health-related physical fitness in physiotherapy practice: reliability, validity, and feasibility of clinical field tests and a patient-reported measure.
    Tveter AT; Dagfinrud H; Moseng T; Holm I
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2014 Mar; 44(3):206-16. PubMed ID: 24450369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relationship among physical activity, motor competence and health-related fitness in 14-year-old adolescents.
    Hands B; Larkin D; Parker H; Straker L; Perry M
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2009 Oct; 19(5):655-63. PubMed ID: 18694431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Construct validity of physical activity and sedentary behaviors staging measures for adolescents.
    Hagler AS; Calfas KJ; Norman GJ; Sallis JF; Patrick K
    Ann Behav Med; 2006 Apr; 31(2):186-93. PubMed ID: 16542134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity and reliability of activity measures in African-American girls for GEMS.
    Treuth MS; Sherwood NE; Butte NF; McClanahan B; Obarzanek E; Zhou A; Ayers C; Adolph A; Jordan J; Jacobs DR; Rochon J
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 Mar; 35(3):532-9. PubMed ID: 12618587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer accuracy under controlled conditions.
    Le Masurier GC; Tudor-Locke C
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 May; 35(5):867-71. PubMed ID: 12750599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.