These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. The ability of different nickel-titanium rotary instruments to induce dentinal damage during canal preparation. Bier CA; Shemesh H; Tanomaru-Filho M; Wesselink PR; Wu MK J Endod; 2009 Feb; 35(2):236-8. PubMed ID: 19166781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of defects in ProFile and ProTaper systems after clinical use. Shen Y; Cheung GS; Bian Z; Peng B J Endod; 2006 Jan; 32(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 16410072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nickel-titanium rotary instrument fracture: a clinical practice assessment. Di Fiore PM; Genov KA; Komaroff E; Li Y; Lin L Int Endod J; 2006 Sep; 39(9):700-8. PubMed ID: 16916359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modes of failure of ProTaper nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use. Wei X; Ling J; Jiang J; Huang X; Liu L J Endod; 2007 Mar; 33(3):276-9. PubMed ID: 17320713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of three nickel titanium rotary systems, EndoSequence, ProTaper universal, and profile GT, for canal-cleaning ability. Williamson AE; Sandor AJ; Justman BC J Endod; 2009 Jan; 35(1):107-9. PubMed ID: 19084136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture resistance of electropolished rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. Anderson ME; Price JW; Parashos P J Endod; 2007 Oct; 33(10):1212-6. PubMed ID: 17889692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cyclic fatigue and fracture characteristics of ground and twisted nickel-titanium rotary files. Kim HC; Yum J; Hur B; Cheung GS J Endod; 2010 Jan; 36(1):147-52. PubMed ID: 20003955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Wear of nickel-titanium lightspeed instruments evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. Eggert C; Peters O; Barbakow F J Endod; 1999 Jul; 25(7):494-7. PubMed ID: 10687515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of electropolishing on torque and force during simulated root canal preparation with ProTaper shaping files. Boessler C; Paque F; Peters OA J Endod; 2009 Jan; 35(1):102-6. PubMed ID: 19084135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative analysis of torsional and bending stresses in two mathematical models of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: ProTaper versus ProFile. Berutti E; Chiandussi G; Gaviglio I; Ibba A J Endod; 2003 Jan; 29(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 12540212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Paqué F; Musch U; Hülsmann M Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 15606817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of defects in ProTaper hand-operated instruments after clinical use. Shen Y; Bian Z; Cheung GS; Peng B J Endod; 2007 Mar; 33(3):287-90. PubMed ID: 17320716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Defects in nickel-titanium instruments after clinical use. Part 3: a 4-year retrospective study from an undergraduate clinic. Shen Y; Coil JM; Haapasalo M J Endod; 2009 Feb; 35(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 19166771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]