These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15107649)

  • 1. Effect of dentin on the antibacterial activity of dentin bonding agents.
    Schmalz G; Ergücü Z; Hiller KA
    J Endod; 2004 May; 30(5):352-8. PubMed ID: 15107649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of dentin on the effectiveness of antibacterial agents.
    Ergücü Z; Hiller KA; Schmalz G
    J Endod; 2005 Feb; 31(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 15671825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of antibacterial activity of simplified adhesive systems.
    Imazato S; Kuramoto A; Kaneko T; Ebisu S; Russell RR
    Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):356-60. PubMed ID: 12693381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Antibacterial activities of MDPB and fluoride in dentin bonding agents.
    Ozer F; Unlü N; Karakaya S; Ergani O; Hadimli HH
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Sep; 13(3):139-42. PubMed ID: 16180641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Antibacterial activity of fifth-generation dentin bonding systems.
    Atac AS; Cehreli ZC; Sener B
    J Endod; 2001 Dec; 27(12):730-3. PubMed ID: 11771577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of human dentine on the antibacterial activity of self-etching adhesive systems against cariogenic bacteria.
    Gondim JO; Duque C; Hebling J; Giro EM
    J Dent; 2008 Apr; 36(4):241-8. PubMed ID: 18276056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of antibacterial activity of three dentin primers using an in vitro tooth model.
    Ohmori K; Maeda N; Kohno A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(5):279-85. PubMed ID: 10823074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Antibacterial activity of resin adhesives, glass ionomer and resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a compomer in contact with dentin caries samples.
    Herrera M; Castillo A; Bravo M; Liébana J; Carrión P
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 11203829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Antibacterial activity of various self-etching adhesive systems against oral streptococci.
    Esteves CM; Ota-Tsuzuki C; Reis AF; Rodrigues JA
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(4):448-53. PubMed ID: 20672730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the antibacterial activity of different self-etching primers and adhesives.
    Korkmaz Y; Ozalp M; Attar N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):57-64. PubMed ID: 18997917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Antibacterial activity of different generation dentin-bonding systems.
    Başeren M; Yazici AR; Ozalp M; Dayangaç B
    Quintessence Int; 2005 May; 36(5):339-44. PubMed ID: 15892530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of novel formulations containing Lysozyme and Lactoferrin and evaluation of antibacterial effects on Mutans Streptococci and Lactobacilli.
    Tonguc-Altin K; Sandalli N; Duman G; Selvi-Kuvvetli S; Topcuoglu N; Kulekci G
    Arch Oral Biol; 2015 May; 60(5):706-14. PubMed ID: 25757148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Antimicrobial properties of self-etching primer-bonding systems.
    Cehreli ZC; Stephan A; Sener B
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 12670069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inhibitory activity of glass-ionomer cements on cariogenic bacteria.
    Duque C; Negrini Tde C; Hebling J; Spolidorio DM
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(5):636-40. PubMed ID: 16268399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro inhibition of bacterial growth using different dental adhesive systems.
    Walter R; Duarte WR; Pereira PN; Heymann HO; Swift EJ; Arnold RR
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(4):388-93. PubMed ID: 17695612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. No evidence for the growth-stimulating effect of monomers on cariogenic Streptococci.
    Nedeljkovic I; Yoshihara K; De Munck J; Teughels W; Van Meerbeek B; Van Landuyt KL
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jun; 21(5):1861-1869. PubMed ID: 27766489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Antibacterial activity of two adhesive systems using various microbiological methods.
    Türkün LS; Ateş M; Türkün M; Uzer E
    J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 16430013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of antibacterial activity of two dentin bonding systems using agar well technique and tooth cavity model.
    Ozer F; Karakaya S; Unlü N; Erganiş O; Kav K; Imazato S
    J Dent; 2003 Feb; 31(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 12654550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Antibacterial surface properties of polymerized single-bottle bonding agents: part II.
    Slutzky H; Matalon S; Weiss EI
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Apr; 35(4):275-9. PubMed ID: 15119712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Antibacterial activity of dentinal bonding agents.
    Emilson CG; Bergenholtz G
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Jul; 24(7):511-5. PubMed ID: 8210322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.