203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15107891)
1. New cervical screening legislation: access to clinical records.
Lewis H
N Z Med J; 2004 Apr; 117(1191):U829. PubMed ID: 15107891
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical screening legislation is unethical and has the potential to be counter-productive.
Wallis K
N Z Med J; 2007 Nov; 120(1266):U2840. PubMed ID: 18264209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Health Amendment Act allowing access to clinical records.
Wallis K
N Z Med J; 2004 May; 117(1193):U880. PubMed ID: 15133527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Law, ethics and epidemiology: the case of the cervical screening audit.
Davidson H; Dawson J; Moore A
N Z Bioeth J; 2001 Jun; 2(2):8-26. PubMed ID: 15586993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conventional Pap smears are unreliable.
Reid RI
Med J Aust; 1998 Mar; 168(5):252. PubMed ID: 9539907
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. New Zealand's cervical screening legislation-and response.
Gray B; Lewis H; Casey D
N Z Med J; 2008 Jan; 121(1268):U2910. PubMed ID: 18256722
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. "But it's mine--isn't it?".
Satyanand JA
N Z Med J; 2002 Jan; 115(1146):20-2. PubMed ID: 11936331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Use and disclosure of health information in genetic research: weighing the impact of the new federal medical privacy rule.
Kulynych J; Korn D
Am J Law Med; 2002; 28(2-3):309-24. PubMed ID: 12197467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. AIDS confidentiality doesn't stop subponea of medical records.
AIDS Policy Law; 2001 Dec; 16(22):10. PubMed ID: 11775997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Synopsis of state case and statutory law.
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2002; 2(2):365-446. PubMed ID: 14606496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cytopathology in Finland.
Toivonen T; Nieminen P; Tarkkanen J; Timonen T; Krogerus L; Klemi P
Cytopathology; 2005 Aug; 16(4):210-4. PubMed ID: 16048508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Contraindications for cervix screening].
Reiso H; Homb N
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1990 Oct; 110(24):3156. PubMed ID: 2237874
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Nursing care strategy. Disclose the diagnosis?].
Chino D
Soins Psychiatr; 2001 Nov; (217):24-6. PubMed ID: 11949598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Should the law require doctors to make records available for audit of cervical screening?
Paul C
N Z Med J; 2001 Nov; 114(1143):499-500. PubMed ID: 11797876
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A cervical cytology screening programme in the Thames area. Second and third years of study.
McIndoe WA
N Z Med J; 1966 Oct; 65(410):647-51. PubMed ID: 5224361
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Health care information and privacy.
Metcalf J
J Law Med; 2002 Aug; 10(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 12242878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [New ways of cervical cancer screening].
Teikari M
Duodecim; 2004; 120(13):1595-6; discussion 1596-7. PubMed ID: 15326967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Court ruling limits prosecutors' access to patient records.
Worth RF
N Y Times Web; 2002 Oct; ():B8. PubMed ID: 12474843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Release of behavioral health, developmental disabilities, HIV, and substance abuse information: guidelines for legal compliance.
Gordon EL
Health Care Law Mon; 2000 Dec; ():3-16. PubMed ID: 11924157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Cervix cancer screening can be cost-effective. Combination of vaginal smears and the HPV test should be even more beneficial].
Bistoletti P; Ellström A; Dillner J; Sennfält K; Sparén P; Strander B
Lakartidningen; 2005 Jun 13-26; 102(24-25):1874-6, 1878-9. PubMed ID: 16044766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
