168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15108239)
1. Significance of subclassifying high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions into moderate dysplasia/CIN II versus severe dysplasia/CIN III/CIS in the Bethesda System terminology.
Howell LP; Zhou H; Wu W; Davis R
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 May; 30(5):362-6. PubMed ID: 15108239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Distribution of human papillomavirus types in ThinPrep Papanicolaou tests classified according to the Bethesda 2001 terminology and correlations with patient age and biopsy outcomes.
Evans MF; Adamson CS; Papillo JL; St John TL; Leiman G; Cooper K
Cancer; 2006 Mar; 106(5):1054-64. PubMed ID: 16421920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of Pap Test terminology and age in the detection of carcinoma invasive and carcinoma in situ in medically underserved California women.
Howell LP; Tabnak F; Tudury AJ; Stoodt G
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Apr; 30(4):227-34. PubMed ID: 15048955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion/cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL-H) is a unique category of cytologic abnormality associated with distinctive HPV and histopathologic CIN 2+ detection rates.
Barron S; Li Z; Austin RM; Zhao C
Am J Clin Pathol; 2014 Feb; 141(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 24436272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and histology.
Rossetti D; Gerli S; Saab JC; Di Renzo GC
J Med Liban; 2000; 48(3):127-30. PubMed ID: 11268564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical importance of "low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL-H)" terminology for cervical smears 5-year analysis of the positive predictive value of LSIL-H compared with ASC-H, LSIL, and HSIL in the detection of high-grade cervical lesions with a review of the literature.
Ince U; Aydin O; Peker O
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Apr; 121(1):152-6. PubMed ID: 21211831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity of sampling error as a cause of noncorrelation.
Hearp ML; Locante AM; Ben-Rubin M; Dietrich R; David O
Cancer; 2007 Oct; 111(5):275-9. PubMed ID: 17665495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The significance of "low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion" as a distinct squamous abnormality category in Papanicolaou tests.
Elsheikh TM; Kirkpatrick JL; Wu HH
Cancer; 2006 Oct; 108(5):277-81. PubMed ID: 16937376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utility of p16 Immunohistochemistry in Evaluating Negative Cervical Biopsies Following High-risk Pap Test Results.
Shain AF; Kwok S; Folkins AK; Kong CS
Am J Surg Pathol; 2018 Jan; 42(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 29112019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The clinical significance of "squamous intraepithelial lesion of indeterminate grade" as a distinct cytologic category.
Wong D; Teschendorf C; Lin GY; Hasteh F
Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 May; 137(5):753-60. PubMed ID: 22523214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is the HSIL subclassification cytologically real and clinically justified?
Milicić-Juhas V; Pajtler M
Coll Antropol; 2010 Jun; 34(2):395-400. PubMed ID: 20698108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-Tiered versus Two-Tiered Classification of Squamous Dysplasia in Cervical Cytology: Results of a Follow-Up Study.
Marquardt K; Ziemke P; Neumann K
Acta Cytol; 2019; 63(1):44-49. PubMed ID: 30517915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patients with negative cervical biopsies after papanicolaou test interpretations of "atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion": comparative longitudinal follow-up.
Huitron S; Bonvicino A; Fadare O
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2008 Jun; 12(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 18486894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of ASC-H terminology on the detection of HSILs in medically underserved California women.
Howell LP; Gurusinghe S; Tabnak F
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Feb; 37(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 19021201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation discrepancies between high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a cytological/histological correlation study from a single-institution experience.
Zhang M; Carrozza M; Huang Y
Acta Cytol; 2014; 58(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 24335093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical significance of the diagnosis of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Alsharif M; Kjeldahl K; Curran C; Miller S; Gulbahce HE; Pambuccian SE
Cancer; 2009 Apr; 117(2):92-100. PubMed ID: 19365830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the clinical significance of the Papanicolaou test interpretations LSIL cannot rule out HSIL and ASC-H.
Difurio MJ; Mailhiot T; Sundborg MJ; Nauschuetz KK
Diagn Cytopathol; 2010 May; 38(5):313-7. PubMed ID: 19813258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The significance of the Papanicolaou smear diagnosis of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Nasser SM; Cibas ES; Crum CP; Faquin WC
Cancer; 2003 Oct; 99(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 14579293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endocervical glandular involvement, positive endocervical surgical margin and multicentricity are more often associated with high-grade than low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Kır G; Karabulut MH; Topal CS; Yılmaz MS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1206-10. PubMed ID: 22540878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in women aged <30 years has a prevalence pattern resembling low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Vale DB; Westin MC; Zeferino LC
Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Oct; 121(10):576-81. PubMed ID: 23765869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
