159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15109114)
1. [Communication strategies used by individuals with moderate sensorineural hearing loss].
de Mello JM; Oliveira JR; Dell'Aringa AH; Oliveira VV; Zacare CC
Pro Fono; 2004; 16(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 15109114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of wireless and acoustic hearing aid-based telephone listening strategies.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(2):209-20. PubMed ID: 20808225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The use of the self-assessment questionnaire to evaluate hearing aid benefit].
de Almeida K; Taguchi CK
Pro Fono; 2004; 16(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 15109113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
Davidson LS
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The relationship between nonverbal cognitive functions and hearing loss.
Zekveld AA; Deijen JB; Goverts ST; Kramer SE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Feb; 50(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 17344549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech and language development in a population of Swedish hearing-impaired pre-school children, a cross-sectional study.
Borg E; Edquist G; Reinholdson AC; Risberg A; McAllister B
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jul; 71(7):1061-77. PubMed ID: 17512613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Physiologico-acoustic aspects of improving speech perception in sensorineural and conductive hearing loss].
Moroz BS
Fiziol Cheloveka; 1985; 11(2):228-34. PubMed ID: 4007327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Audiological application criteria for implantable hearing aid devices: a clinical experience at the Nijmegen ORL clinic.
Verhaegen VJ; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW; Snik AF
Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1645-9. PubMed ID: 18677283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of fitting formulas in programmable hearing aids on speech discrimination in noise.
Dündar SE; Aksoy S
Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2007; 17(5):278-82. PubMed ID: 18187987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acclimatization in first-time hearing aid users using three different fitting protocols.
Reber MB; Kompis M
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2005 Dec; 32(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 16039083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of performance on the hearing in noise test using directional microphones and digital noise reduction algorithms.
Nordrum S; Erler S; Garstecki D; Dhar S
Am J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 15(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 16803795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Children's speech recognition scores: the Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level.
Scollie SD
Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):543-56. PubMed ID: 18469717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nursing the hearing impaired patient.
Chovaz C
Can Nurse; 1989 Mar; 85(3):34-6. PubMed ID: 2924277
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Use of hearing aid--coping and functional disability].
Helvik AS; Arnesen H; Wennberg S; Jacobsen G
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Dec; 128(23):2715-8. PubMed ID: 19079418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Receptive language and speech production in children with auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony type hearing loss.
Rance G; Barker EJ; Sarant JZ; Ching TY
Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):694-702. PubMed ID: 17804983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rehabilitation of hearing-impaired adults.
Riko K; Alberti PW
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1984 Nov; 17(4):641-51. PubMed ID: 6240010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hearing aids and cochlear damage: the case against fitting the pure tone audiogram.
Halpin C; Rauch SD
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 May; 140(5):629-32. PubMed ID: 19393401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of satisfaction measures of analog and digital hearing aid users.
Magni C; Freiberger F; Tonn K
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2005; 71(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 16612528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
