These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15109345)
21. Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2. Fox T; Geppert J; Dinnes J; Scandrett K; Bigio J; Sulis G; Hettiarachchi D; Mathangasinghe Y; Weeratunga P; Wickramasinghe D; Bergman H; Buckley BS; Probyn K; Sguassero Y; Davenport C; Cunningham J; Dittrich S; Emperador D; Hooft L; Leeflang MM; McInnes MD; Spijker R; Struyf T; Van den Bruel A; Verbakel JY; Takwoingi Y; Taylor-Phillips S; Deeks JJ; Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Nov; 11(11):CD013652. PubMed ID: 36394900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Imaging modalities to inform the detection and diagnosis of early caries. Walsh T; Macey R; Riley P; Glenny AM; Schwendicke F; Worthington HV; Clarkson JE; Ricketts D; Su TL; Sengupta A Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Mar; 3(3):CD014545. PubMed ID: 33720395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Meta-analysis of diagnostic and screening test accuracy evaluations: methodologic primer. Gatsonis C; Paliwal P AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Aug; 187(2):271-81. PubMed ID: 16861527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Diagnostic accuracy of flow rate testing in urology. Patel HR; Garcia-Montes F; Christopher N; Reeves BC; Emberton M BJU Int; 2003 Jul; 92(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 12823384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Estimates of sensitivity and specificity can be biased when reporting the results of the second test in a screening trial conducted in series. Ringham BM; Alonzo TA; Grunwald GK; Glueck DH BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jan; 10():3. PubMed ID: 20064254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. 123I-MIBG scintigraphy and 18F-FDG-PET imaging for diagnosing neuroblastoma. Bleeker G; Tytgat GA; Adam JA; Caron HN; Kremer LC; Hooft L; van Dalen EC Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Sep; 2015(9):CD009263. PubMed ID: 26417712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Adjusting for differential-verification bias in diagnostic-accuracy studies: a Bayesian approach. de Groot JA; Dendukuri N; Janssen KJ; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM; Moons KG Epidemiology; 2011 Mar; 22(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 21228702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Point-of-care ultrasonography for diagnosing thoracoabdominal injuries in patients with blunt trauma. Stengel D; Leisterer J; Ferrada P; Ekkernkamp A; Mutze S; Hoenning A Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Dec; 12(12):CD012669. PubMed ID: 30548249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Evaluation of diagnostic or screening procedures. Validity of tests, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values. Definition and indications for mass screening]. Durand-Zaleski I; Bastuji-Garin S Rev Prat; 2000 May; 50(10):1155-8. PubMed ID: 10905104 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Dermoscopy, with and without visual inspection, for diagnosing melanoma in adults. Dinnes J; Deeks JJ; Chuchu N; Ferrante di Ruffano L; Matin RN; Thomson DR; Wong KY; Aldridge RB; Abbott R; Fawzy M; Bayliss SE; Grainge MJ; Takwoingi Y; Davenport C; Godfrey K; Walter FM; Williams HC; Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Dec; 12(12):CD011902. PubMed ID: 30521682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fuzzy gold standards: Approaches to handling an imperfect reference standard. Walsh T J Dent; 2018 Jul; 74 Suppl 1():S47-S49. PubMed ID: 29929589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE. Beynon R; Leeflang MM; McDonald S; Eisinga A; Mitchell RL; Whiting P; Glanville JM Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2013(9):MR000022. PubMed ID: 24022476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Ultrasound for diagnosis of birth weight discordance in twin pregnancies. Jahanfar S; Ho JJ; Jaafar SH; Abraha I; Noura M; Ross CR; Pammi M Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Mar; 3(3):CD012553. PubMed ID: 33686672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A randomized trial of ways to describe test accuracy: the effect on physicians' post-test probability estimates. Puhan MA; Steurer J; Bachmann LM; ter Riet G Ann Intern Med; 2005 Aug; 143(3):184-9. PubMed ID: 16061916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical tests for screening and diagnosis of cervical spine myelopathy: a systematic review. Cook CE; Wilhelm M; Cook AE; Petrosino C; Isaacs R J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2011 Oct; 34(8):539-46. PubMed ID: 21899892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The evaluation of diagnostic tests: evidence on technical and diagnostic accuracy, impact on patient outcome and cost-effectiveness is needed. Van den Bruel A; Cleemput I; Aertgeerts B; Ramaekers D; Buntinx F J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 60(11):1116-22. PubMed ID: 17938052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Sensitivity and specificity-like measures of the validity of a diagnostic test that are corrected for chance agreement. Coughlin SS; Pickle LW Epidemiology; 1992 Mar; 3(2):178-81. PubMed ID: 1576224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]