These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15110017)

  • 1. Random field-union intersection tests for EEG/MEG imaging.
    Carbonell F; Galán L; Valdés P; Worsley K; Biscay RJ; Díaz-Comas L; Bobes MA; Parra M
    Neuroimage; 2004 May; 22(1):268-76. PubMed ID: 15110017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Random fields--union intersection tests for detecting functional connectivity in EEG/MEG imaging.
    Carbonell F; Worsley KJ; Trujillo-Barreto NJ; Sotero RC
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Aug; 30(8):2477-86. PubMed ID: 19184994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian model averaging in EEG/MEG imaging.
    Trujillo-Barreto NJ; Aubert-Vázquez E; Valdés-Sosa PA
    Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1300-19. PubMed ID: 15050557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnetoencephalography is more successful for screening and localizing frontal lobe epilepsy than electroencephalography.
    Ossenblok P; de Munck JC; Colon A; Drolsbach W; Boon P
    Epilepsia; 2007 Nov; 48(11):2139-49. PubMed ID: 17662061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Geometrical interpretation of fMRI-guided MEG/EEG inverse estimates.
    Ahlfors SP; Simpson GV
    Neuroimage; 2004 May; 22(1):323-32. PubMed ID: 15110022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of epileptiform activity by human interpreters: blinded comparison between electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography.
    Iwasaki M; Pestana E; Burgess RC; Lüders HO; Shamoto H; Nakasato N
    Epilepsia; 2005 Jan; 46(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 15660769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of random field theory and permutation methods for the statistical analysis of MEG data.
    Pantazis D; Nichols TE; Baillet S; Leahy RM
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(2):383-94. PubMed ID: 15784416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving permutation test power for group analysis of spatially filtered MEG data.
    Chau W; McIntosh AR; Robinson SE; Schulz M; Pantev C
    Neuroimage; 2004 Nov; 23(3):983-96. PubMed ID: 15528099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatiotemporal Bayesian inference dipole analysis for MEG neuroimaging data.
    Jun SC; George JS; Paré-Blagoev J; Plis SM; Ranken DM; Schmidt DM; Wood CC
    Neuroimage; 2005 Oct; 28(1):84-98. PubMed ID: 16023866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The t-CWT: a new ERP detection and quantification method based on the continuous wavelet transform and Student's t-statistics.
    Bostanov V; Kotchoubey B
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Dec; 117(12):2627-44. PubMed ID: 17030012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical control of artifacts in dense array EEG/MEG studies.
    Junghöfer M; Elbert T; Tucker DM; Rockstroh B
    Psychophysiology; 2000 Jul; 37(4):523-32. PubMed ID: 10934911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data.
    Maris E; Oostenveld R
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Aug; 164(1):177-90. PubMed ID: 17517438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mapping single-trial EEG records on the cortical surface through a spatiotemporal modality.
    Tsai AC; Liou M; Jung TP; Onton JA; Cheng PE; Huang CC; Duann JR; Makeig S
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(1):195-207. PubMed ID: 16730194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High resolution T association tests of complex diseases based on family data.
    Fan R; Knapp M; Wjst M; Zhao C; Xiong M
    Ann Hum Genet; 2005 Mar; 69(Pt 2):187-208. PubMed ID: 15720300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An automatic procedure for the analysis of electric and magnetic mismatch negativity based on anatomical brain mapping.
    Zvyagintsev M; Thönnessen H; Dammers J; Boers F; Mathiak K
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Mar; 168(2):325-33. PubMed ID: 18093661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Parallel Factor Analysis as an exploratory tool for wavelet transformed event-related EEG.
    Mørup M; Hansen LK; Herrmann CS; Parnas J; Arnfred SM
    Neuroimage; 2006 Feb; 29(3):938-47. PubMed ID: 16185898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimum Overlap Component Analysis (MOCA) of EEG/MEG data for more than two sources.
    Nolte G; Marzetti L; Valdes Sosa P
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Sep; 183(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 19596027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conjunction group analysis: an alternative to mixed/random effect analysis.
    Heller R; Golland Y; Malach R; Benjamini Y
    Neuroimage; 2007 Oct; 37(4):1178-85. PubMed ID: 17689266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Benign partial epilepsy in childhood: selective cognitive deficits are related to the location of focal spikes determined by combined EEG/MEG.
    Wolff M; Weiskopf N; Serra E; Preissl H; Birbaumer N; Kraegeloh-Mann I
    Epilepsia; 2005 Oct; 46(10):1661-7. PubMed ID: 16190940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mapping human brain function with MEG and EEG: methods and validation.
    Darvas F; Pantazis D; Kucukaltun-Yildirim E; Leahy RM
    Neuroimage; 2004; 23 Suppl 1():S289-99. PubMed ID: 15501098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.