287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15110022)
1. Geometrical interpretation of fMRI-guided MEG/EEG inverse estimates.
Ahlfors SP; Simpson GV
Neuroimage; 2004 May; 22(1):323-32. PubMed ID: 15110022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A technique to consider mismatches between fMRI and EEG/MEG sources for fMRI-constrained EEG/MEG source imaging: a preliminary simulation study.
Im CH; Lee SY
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 51(23):6005-21. PubMed ID: 17110766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimation of the effective and functional human cortical connectivity with structural equation modeling and directed transfer function applied to high-resolution EEG.
Astolfi L; Cincotti F; Mattia D; Salinari S; Babiloni C; Basilisco A; Rossini PM; Ding L; Ni Y; He B; Marciani MG; Babiloni F
Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Dec; 22(10):1457-70. PubMed ID: 15707795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multimodal integration of EEG, MEG and fMRI data for the solution of the neuroimage puzzle.
Babiloni F; Mattia D; Babiloni C; Astolfi L; Salinari S; Basilisco A; Rossini PM; Marciani MG; Cincotti F
Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Dec; 22(10):1471-6. PubMed ID: 15707796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hierarchical Bayesian estimation for MEG inverse problem.
Sato MA; Yoshioka T; Kajihara S; Toyama K; Goda N; Doya K; Kawato M
Neuroimage; 2004 Nov; 23(3):806-26. PubMed ID: 15528082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using ICA and realistic BOLD models to obtain joint EEG/fMRI solutions to the problem of source localization.
Brookings T; Ortigue S; Grafton S; Carlson J
Neuroimage; 2009 Jan; 44(2):411-20. PubMed ID: 18845263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fundamentals of electroencefalography, magnetoencefalography, and functional magnetic resonance imaging.
Babiloni C; Pizzella V; Gratta CD; Ferretti A; Romani GL
Int Rev Neurobiol; 2009; 86():67-80. PubMed ID: 19607991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Independent component analysis of short-time Fourier transforms for spontaneous EEG/MEG analysis.
Hyvärinen A; Ramkumar P; Parkkonen L; Hari R
Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(1):257-71. PubMed ID: 19699307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An integrative MEG-fMRI study of the primary somatosensory cortex using cross-modal correspondence analysis.
Schulz M; Chau W; Graham SJ; McIntosh AR; Ross B; Ishii R; Pantev C
Neuroimage; 2004 May; 22(1):120-33. PubMed ID: 15110002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Integrated MEG/EEG and fMRI model based on neural masses.
Babajani A; Soltanian-Zadeh H
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1794-801. PubMed ID: 16941835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bayesian analysis of the neuromagnetic inverse problem with l(p)-norm priors.
Auranen T; Nummenmaa A; Hämäläinen MS; Jääskeläinen IP; Lampinen J; Vehtari A; Sams M
Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(3):870-84. PubMed ID: 15955497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Integrated MEG and fMRI model: synthesis and analysis.
Babajani A; Nekooei MH; Soltanian-Zadeh H
Brain Topogr; 2005; 18(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 16341578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of epileptiform activity by human interpreters: blinded comparison between electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography.
Iwasaki M; Pestana E; Burgess RC; Lüders HO; Shamoto H; Nakasato N
Epilepsia; 2005 Jan; 46(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 15660769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetoencephalography is more successful for screening and localizing frontal lobe epilepsy than electroencephalography.
Ossenblok P; de Munck JC; Colon A; Drolsbach W; Boon P
Epilepsia; 2007 Nov; 48(11):2139-49. PubMed ID: 17662061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling.
Wolters CH; Anwander A; Tricoche X; Weinstein D; Koch MA; MacLeod RS
Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):813-26. PubMed ID: 16364662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Voxel-wise information theoretic EEG-fMRI feature integration.
Ostwald D; Porcaro C; Bagshaw AP
Neuroimage; 2011 Apr; 55(3):1270-86. PubMed ID: 21167287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spatiotemporal Bayesian inference dipole analysis for MEG neuroimaging data.
Jun SC; George JS; Paré-Blagoev J; Plis SM; Ranken DM; Schmidt DM; Wood CC
Neuroimage; 2005 Oct; 28(1):84-98. PubMed ID: 16023866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multivariate source prelocalization (MSP): use of functionally informed basis functions for better conditioning the MEG inverse problem.
Mattout J; Pélégrini-Issac M; Garnero L; Benali H
Neuroimage; 2005 Jun; 26(2):356-73. PubMed ID: 15907296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Bayesian approach to introducing anatomo-functional priors in the EEG/MEG inverse problem.
Baillet S; Garnero L
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1997 May; 44(5):374-85. PubMed ID: 9125822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
