250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15110458)
1. A simple theoretical verification of monitor unit calculation for intensity modulated beams using dynamic mini-multileaf collimation.
Linthout N; Verellen D; Van Acker S; Storme G
Radiother Oncol; 2004 May; 71(2):235-41. PubMed ID: 15110458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of an aSi-based EPID for routine absolute dosimetric pre-treatment verification of dynamic IMRT fields.
Van Esch A; Depuydt T; Huyskens DP
Radiother Oncol; 2004 May; 71(2):223-34. PubMed ID: 15110457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient-specific IMRT verification using independent fluence-based dose calculation software: experimental benchmarking and initial clinical experience.
Georg D; Stock M; Kroupa B; Olofsson J; Nyholm T; Ahnesjö A; Karlsson M
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4981-92. PubMed ID: 17671348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A dose verification method using a monitor unit matrix for dynamic IMRT on Varian linear accelerators.
Chen X; Yue NJ; Chen W; Saw CB; Heron DE; Stefanik D; Antemann R; Huq MS
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5641-52. PubMed ID: 16306658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of dynamic and step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning and delivery.
Alaei P; Higgins PD; Weaver R; Nguyen N
Med Dosim; 2004; 29(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15023386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fast, daily linac verification for segmented IMRT using electronic portal imaging.
Vieira SC; Bolt RA; Dirkx ML; Visser AG; Heijmen BJ
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Jul; 80(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 16854483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Head-and-neck IMRT treatments assessed with a Monte Carlo dose calculation engine.
Seco J; Adams E; Bidmead M; Partridge M; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):817-30. PubMed ID: 15798257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of monitor unit software and the application of action levels.
Georg D; Nyholm T; Olofsson J; Kjaer-Kristoffersen F; Schnekenburger B; Winkler P; Nyström H; Ahnesjö A; Karlsson M
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Nov; 85(2):306-15. PubMed ID: 17904234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a 2D diode array for IMRT quality assurance.
Létourneau D; Gulam M; Yan D; Oldham M; Wong JW
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Feb; 70(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 15028408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Monte Carlo-based procedure for independent monitor unit calculation in IMRT treatment plans.
Pisaturo O; Moeckli R; Mirimanoff RO; Bochud FO
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(13):4299-310. PubMed ID: 19531844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Independent monitor unit calculation for intensity modulated radiotherapy using the MIMiC multileaf collimator.
Chen Z; Xing L; Nath R
Med Phys; 2002 Sep; 29(9):2041-51. PubMed ID: 12349925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improvement of radiotherapy treatment delivery accuracy using an electronic portal imaging device.
Dirkx ML; de Boer JC; Heijmen BJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(1):70-9. PubMed ID: 16877471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric verification of IMRT treatment planning using Monte Carlo simulations for prostate cancer.
Yang J; Li J; Chen L; Price R; McNeeley S; Qin L; Wang L; Xiong W; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):869-78. PubMed ID: 15798261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Accuracy of dynamic multileaf position and influence of beam profile according to change in dose monitor unit in QA plan of intensity modulated radiotherapy].
Okumura M; Hashiba H; Hayakumo R; Shintani N; Matsumoto K; Sumita M; Murano Y
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 Jun; 58(6):773-82. PubMed ID: 12518098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A practical Monte Carlo MU verification tool for IMRT quality assurance.
Fan J; Li J; Chen L; Stathakis S; Luo W; Du Plessis F; Xiong W; Yang J; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2503-15. PubMed ID: 16675866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of IMRT and leaf width on stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver and lung lesions.
Dvorak P; Georg D; Bogner J; Kroupa B; Dieckmann K; Pötter R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Apr; 61(5):1572-81. PubMed ID: 15817364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of peripheral dose data from uniform dynamic multileaf collimation fields to estimate out-of-field organ dose in patients treated employing sliding window intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
Sharma SD; Upreti RR; Deshpande DD
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(11):2987-95. PubMed ID: 16723779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of statistical uncertainties on Monte Carlo treatment planning.
Ma CM; Li JS; Jiang SB; Pawlicki T; Xiong W; Qin LH; Yang J
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):891-907. PubMed ID: 15798263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A separated primary and scatter model for independent dose calculation of intensity modulated radiotherapy.
Baker CR; Clements R; Gately A; Budgell GJ
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Sep; 80(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 16956682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can photon IMRT be improved by combination with mixed electron and photon techniques?
Mu X; Olofsson L; Karlsson M; Sjögren R; Zackrisson B
Acta Oncol; 2004; 43(8):727-35. PubMed ID: 15764217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
