These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15110911)

  • 1. Varying reinforcer duration produces behavioral interactions during multiple schedules.
    McSweeney FK; Murphy ES; Kowal BP
    Behav Processes; 2004 May; 66(2):83-100. PubMed ID: 15110911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Within-session rates of responding when reinforcer magnitude is changed within the session.
    Weatherly JN; McSweeney FK; Swindell S
    J Gen Psychol; 2004 Jan; 131(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 14977028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Response-reinforcer relations and resistance to change.
    Podlesnik CA; Shahan TA
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jan; 77(1):109-25. PubMed ID: 17706897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Successive independence and behavioral contrast in a closed economy.
    White KG; Alsop B; McLean AP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Sep; 58(2):313-23. PubMed ID: 1402604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relation of multiple-schedule behavioral contrast to deprivation, time in session, and within-session changes in responding.
    McSweeney FK; Swindell S; Murphy ES; Kowal BP
    Learn Behav; 2004 May; 32(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 15281391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stimulus change dis-habituates operant responding supported by water reinforcers.
    McSweeney FK; Kowal BP; Murphy ES; Wiediger RS
    Behav Processes; 2005 Nov; 70(3):235-46. PubMed ID: 16112816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Resistance to extinction in the steady state and in transition.
    Nevin JA; Grace RC
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Apr; 31(2):199-212. PubMed ID: 15839776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigations of timing during the schedule and reinforcement intervals with wheel-running reinforcement.
    Belke TW; Christie-Fougere MM
    Behav Processes; 2006 Nov; 73(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 16844324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response persistence under variable-time schedules following immediate and unsignalled delayed reinforcement.
    Doughty AH; Lattal KA
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2003 Aug; 56(3):267-77. PubMed ID: 12881162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Four-alternative choice violates the constant-ratio rule.
    Elliffe D; Davison M
    Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):381-9. PubMed ID: 19941942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.
    McLean AP; Blampied NM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jan; 75(1):25-42. PubMed ID: 11256865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of rate of reinforcement and time in session on preference for variability.
    McSweeney FK; Kowal BP; Murphy ES
    Learn Behav; 2003 Aug; 31(3):225-41. PubMed ID: 14577547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Behavioral effects of intra-cranial self-stimulation in an animal model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
    Johansen EB; Sagvolden T
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 162(1):32-46. PubMed ID: 15922065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Behavioral momentum and accumulation of mass in multiple schedules.
    Craig AR; Cunningham PJ; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 May; 103(3):437-49. PubMed ID: 25787824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extinguished operant responding shows stimulus specificity.
    McSweeney FK; Murphy ES; Kowal BP
    Behav Processes; 2004 Mar; 65(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 14998658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of reinforcer magnitude on reinforced behavioral variability.
    Doughty AH; Giorno KG; Miller HL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Nov; 100(3):355-69. PubMed ID: 24122484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of delayed reinforcers on the behavior of an animal model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
    Johansen EB; Sagvolden T; Kvande G
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 162(1):47-61. PubMed ID: 15922066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does the terminal-link effect depend on duration or reinforcement rate?
    Grace RC; Bragason O
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jul; 67(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 15182927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Signals, resistance to change, and conditioned reinforcement in a multiple schedule.
    Bell MC; Gomez BE; Kessler K
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 18355988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Within-session changes in responding during concurrent schedules with different reinforcers in the components.
    McSweeney FK; Swindell S; Weatherly JN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 Nov; 66(3):369-90. PubMed ID: 8921615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.