127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15111816)
1. The use of Novabone and Norian in cranioplasty: a comparative study.
Elshahat A; Shermak MA; Inoue N; Chao EY; Manson P
J Craniofac Surg; 2004 May; 15(3):483-9. PubMed ID: 15111816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Histomorphometric evaluation of bone regeneration using allogeneic and alloplastic bone substitutes.
Moghadam HG; Sándor GK; Holmes HH; Clokie CM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Feb; 62(2):202-13. PubMed ID: 14762753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Closure of critical sized defects with allogenic and alloplastic bone substitutes.
Clokie CM; Moghadam H; Jackson MT; Sandor GK
J Craniofac Surg; 2002 Jan; 13(1):111-21; discussion 122-3. PubMed ID: 11887007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reconstruction of complex cranial wounds with demineralized bone matrix and bilayer artificial skin.
Shermak MA; Wong L; Inoue N; Nicol T
J Craniofac Surg; 2000 May; 11(3):224-31. PubMed ID: 11314300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bone and suture regeneration in calvarial defects by e-PTFE-membranes and demineralized bone matrix and the impact on calvarial growth: an experimental study in the rat.
Mardas N; Kostopoulos L; Karring T
J Craniofac Surg; 2002 May; 13(3):453-62; discussion 462-4. PubMed ID: 12040218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Repair of craniofacial defects with hydroxyapatite cement.
Lew D; Farrell B; Bardach J; Keller J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 Dec; 55(12):1441-9; discussion 1449-51. PubMed ID: 9393404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the osteogenic potential of OsteoSelect demineralized bone matrix putty to NovaBone calcium-phosphosilicate synthetic putty in a cranial defect model.
Schallenberger MA; Rossmeier K; Lovick HM; Meyer TR; Aberman HM; Juda GA
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Mar; 25(2):657-61. PubMed ID: 24577306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Histologic study of a bovine demineralized bone matrix on bone repair process in rabbits calvaria.
Garcia RR; Barbosa JR
Indian J Dent Res; 2000; 11(4):131-8. PubMed ID: 11307636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnesium-based bone cement and bone void filler: preliminary experimental studies.
Schendel SA; Peauroi J
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20(2):461-4. PubMed ID: 19305245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reconstruction of the immature craniofacial skeleton with a carbonated calcium phosphate bone cement: interaction with bioresorbable mesh.
Losee JE; Karmacharya J; Gannon FH; Slemp AE; Ong G; Hunenko O; Gorden AD; Bartlett SP; Kirschner RE
J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Jan; 14(1):117-24. PubMed ID: 12544233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of an osteostimulative putty in the sheep spine.
Wang Z; Lu B; Chen L; Chang J
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2011 Jan; 22(1):185-91. PubMed ID: 21052796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Controversies in skull reconstruction.
Zins JE; Langevin CJ; Nasir S
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 21(6):1755-60. PubMed ID: 21119415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Closure of rabbit calvarial critical-sized defects using protective composite allogeneic and alloplastic bone substitutes.
Haddad AJ; Peel SA; Clokie CM; Sándor GK
J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Sep; 17(5):926-34. PubMed ID: 17003622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bone regeneration in athymic calvarial defects with Accell DBM100.
Mhawi AA; Peel SA; Fok TC; Clokie CM
J Craniofac Surg; 2007 May; 18(3):497-503. PubMed ID: 17538308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Degradable injectable bone cement in maxillofacial surgery: indications and clinical experience in 27 patients.
Wolff KD; Swaid S; Nolte D; Böckmann RA; Hölzle F; Müller-Mai C
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2004 Apr; 32(2):71-9. PubMed ID: 14980585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Early effect of platelet-rich plasma on bone healing in combination with an osteoconductive material in rat cranial defects.
Plachokova AS; van den Dolder J; Stoelinga PJ; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Apr; 18(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 17348890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Histological comparison of demineralized bone matrix and the Ricinus communis polymer on bone regeneration.
Laureano Filho JR; Castelo Branco Bde L; Andrade ES; Barbosa JR
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2007; 73(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 17589726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Demineralized bone matrix and calcium-phosphate cement in bone regeneration in rats.
Silva LCFD; Porto GG; Andrade ESS; Laureano Filho JR
Acta Cir Bras; 2018 Apr; 33(4):354-361. PubMed ID: 29768538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison between autograft alone, bone cement, and demineralized bone matrix in cranioplasty.
Plum AW; Tatum SA
Laryngoscope; 2015 Jun; 125(6):1322-7. PubMed ID: 25641743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of demineralized bone matrix in the repair of segmental defects. Augmentation with extracted matrix proteins and a comparison with autologous grafts.
Bolander ME; Balian G
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1986 Oct; 68(8):1264-74. PubMed ID: 3533947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
