These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15112283)
21. Importance of tumor location in patients with high preoperative prostate specific antigen levels (greater than 20 ng/ml) treated with radical prostatectomy. Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Peck HJ; Walsh PC; Epstein JI; Trock BJ; Gonzalgo ML J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1311-5. PubMed ID: 17698095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prostate cancers diagnosed at repeat biopsy are smaller and less likely to be high grade. Tan N; Lane BR; Li J; Moussa AS; Soriano M; Jones JS J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1325-9; discussion 1329. PubMed ID: 18707706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Intensifying the saturation biopsy technique for detecting prostate cancer after previous negative biopsies: a step in the wrong direction. Simon J; Kuefer R; Bartsch G; Volkmer BG; Hautmann RE; Gottfried HW BJU Int; 2008 Aug; 102(4):459-62. PubMed ID: 18325061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Percentage of cancer in prostate biopsies as prognostic factor for staging and postoperative biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy. Villamón-Fort R; Martínez-Jabaloyas JM; Soriano-Sarriá P; Ramos-Soler D; Pastor-Hernández F; Gil-Salom M Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):328-33. PubMed ID: 17495491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Preoperative estimate of extent of disease in T1c: how well can we predict? Austenfeld MS Semin Urol Oncol; 1995 Aug; 13(3):176-80. PubMed ID: 8521129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prediction of pathological stages before prostatectomy in prostate cancer patients: analysis of 12 systematic prostate needle biopsy specimens. Park EA; Lee HJ; Kim KG; Kim SH; Lee SE; Choe GY Int J Urol; 2007 Aug; 14(8):704-8. PubMed ID: 17681059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A model that predicts the probability of positive imaging in prostate cancer cases with biochemical failure after initial definitive local therapy. Choueiri TK; Dreicer R; Paciorek A; Carroll PR; Konety B J Urol; 2008 Mar; 179(3):906-10; discussion 910. PubMed ID: 18207194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Do clinical or urodynamic parameters predict artificial urinary sphincter outcome in post-radical prostatectomy incontinence? Thiel DD; Young PR; Broderick GA; Heckman MG; Wehle MJ; Igel TC; Petrou SP Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):315-9. PubMed ID: 17320671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Role of free prostate-specific antigen measurement in prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer. Johnson L Clin Prostate Cancer; 2002 Dec; 1(3):142-4. PubMed ID: 15046688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Indications for preoperative prostate biopsy in patients undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer. Thomas C; Wiesner C; Melchior S; Gillitzer R; Schmidt F; Thüroff JW J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1938-41; discussion 1941. PubMed ID: 18801501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Conventional assessment of needle biopsy specimens is more useful than digital image analysis of proliferation and DNA ploidy in prediction of positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy. Sengupta S; Cheville JC; Lohse CM; Zincke H; Myers RP; Riehle DL; Pankratz VS; Blute ML; Sebo TJ Urology; 2006 Jul; 68(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 16844452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Inadequacy of prostate-specific antigen doubling time estimates calculated using an ultrasensitive assay of prostate-specific antigen for biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy. Shimizu F; Matsuyama Y; Tominaga T; Ohashi Y; Fujime M Urol Int; 2007; 79(4):356-60. PubMed ID: 18025856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens. Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The role of prostate specific membrane antigen and pepsinogen C tissue expression as an adjunctive method to prostate cancer diagnosis. Antunes AA; Leite KR; Sousa-Canavez JM; Camara-Lopes LH; Srougi M J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):594-600. PubMed ID: 19084862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Re: Kim et al.: detection rates of nonpalpable prostate cancer in Korean men with prostate-specific antigen levels between 2.5 and 4.0 ng/ml (Urology 2010;76:919-922). Shenoy SP; Marla PK; Adappa KK Urology; 2011 Apr; 77(4):1013-4; author reply 1014. PubMed ID: 21477737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate-specific antigen, and Gleason score to predict positive surgical margins. Poulakis V; Witzsch U; de Vries R; Emmerlich V; Meves M; Altmannsberger HM; Becht E Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 15351582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Characterization of minute adenocarcinomas of prostate at radical prostatectomy. Truskinovsky AM; Sanderson H; Epstein JI Urology; 2004 Oct; 64(4):733-7. PubMed ID: 15491711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma. Cheng L; Jones TD; Lin H; Eble JN; Zeng G; Carr MD; Koch MO J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2181-5. PubMed ID: 16280760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Predictive significance of surgical margin status after prostatectomy for prostate cancer during PSA era. Mann MJ; DeCastro GJ; Desai M; Benson MC; McKiernan JM Urology; 2008 Dec; 72(6):1203-7. PubMed ID: 18674807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Percent tumor involvement and risk of biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy. Rampersaud EN; Sun L; Moul JW; Madden J; Freedland SJ J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):571-6; discussion 576. PubMed ID: 18554662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]