364 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15112396)
1. Treatment options for the edentulous mandible: clinical application of the two-implant overdenture.
Carpentieri J
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2004 Mar; 16(2):105-12; quiz 114. PubMed ID: 15112396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A review of clinical and technical considerations for fixed and removable implant prostheses in the edentulous mandible.
Zitzmann NU; Marinello CP
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 11887602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures.
Alfadda SA; Attard NJ; David LA
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants: a 10-year clinical trial.
Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Batenburg RH; Visser A; Vissink A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):722-8. PubMed ID: 19489933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The McGill Consensus Statement on Overdentures. Mandibular 2-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients.
Thomason JM
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2002 Sep; 10(3):95-6. PubMed ID: 12387249
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Implant-stabilized overdentures.
Davis DM
Dent Update; 1997 Apr; 24(3):106-9. PubMed ID: 9515375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of implant support for mandibular dentures on satisfaction, oral and general health-related quality of life: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.
Emami E; Heydecke G; Rompré PH; de Grandmont P; Feine JS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):533-44. PubMed ID: 19515032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [A survey of implant-retained superstructure types in the edentulous mandible in The Netherlands].
de Baat C; Cune MS; Carlsson GE
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2005 Oct; 112(10):363-7. PubMed ID: 16300321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population.
Awad MA; Lund JP; Shapiro SH; Locker D; Klemetti E; Chehade A; Savard A; Feine JS
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 12956494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus conventional dentures: 10 years of care and aftercare.
Visser A; Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 16752625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Immediate provisional implants as abutments for an overdenture in the mandibular edentulous jaw: case presentation.
Ravasini T; Marinello CP
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 14(8):673-7; quiz 678. PubMed ID: 12415884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants.
Walton JN; Glick N; Macentee MI
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):331-9. PubMed ID: 19639067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Building on the proceedings of the McGill conference: implant-retained overdentures in an area of South America.
Markiewicz MR; Marincola M; Tovar LA; Margarone JE; Garlapo DA; Chuang SK
Implant Dent; 2008 Sep; 17(3):288-98. PubMed ID: 18784529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized prospective clinical trial on the effectiveness of three treatment modalities for patients with lower denture problems. A 10 year follow-up study on patient satisfaction.
Raghoebar GM; Meijer HJ; van 't Hof M; Stegenga B; Vissink A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Oct; 32(5):498-503. PubMed ID: 14759108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mandibular overdentures: a review of treatment philosophy and prosthodontic maintenance.
Al-Zubeidi MI; Payne AG
N Z Dent J; 2007 Dec; 103(4):88-97. PubMed ID: 18159719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A cost comparison of mandibular two-implant overdenture and conventional denture treatment.
Takanashi Y; Penrod JR; Lund JP; Feine JS
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 15119869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prosthetic treatment time and satisfaction of edentulous patients treated with conventional or implant-stabilized complete mandibular dentures: a case-control study (part 2).
Hobkirk JA; Abdel-Latif HH; Howlett J; Welfare R; Moles DR
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 19260422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.
Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F
Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The McGill Consensus Statement on Overdentures. Montreal, Quebec, Canada. May 24-25, 2002.
Feine JS; Carlsson GE; Awad MA; Chehade A; Duncan WJ; Gizani S; Head T; Lund JP; MacEntee M; Mericske-Stern R; Mojon P; Morais J; Naert I; Payne AG; Penrod J; Stoker GT; Tawse-Smith A; Taylor TD; Thomason JM; Thomson WM; Wismeijer D
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):413-4. PubMed ID: 12170858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Restoration with implants in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa and patient satisfaction with the implant-supported superstructure.
Peñarrocha M; Larrazábal C; Balaguer J; Serrano C; Silvestre J; Bagán JV
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):651-5. PubMed ID: 17929528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
