These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
360 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15112396)
1. Treatment options for the edentulous mandible: clinical application of the two-implant overdenture. Carpentieri J Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2004 Mar; 16(2):105-12; quiz 114. PubMed ID: 15112396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A review of clinical and technical considerations for fixed and removable implant prostheses in the edentulous mandible. Zitzmann NU; Marinello CP Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 11887602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures. Alfadda SA; Attard NJ; David LA Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants: a 10-year clinical trial. Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Batenburg RH; Visser A; Vissink A Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):722-8. PubMed ID: 19489933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The McGill Consensus Statement on Overdentures. Mandibular 2-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Thomason JM Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2002 Sep; 10(3):95-6. PubMed ID: 12387249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of implant support for mandibular dentures on satisfaction, oral and general health-related quality of life: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Emami E; Heydecke G; Rompré PH; de Grandmont P; Feine JS Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):533-44. PubMed ID: 19515032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [A survey of implant-retained superstructure types in the edentulous mandible in The Netherlands]. de Baat C; Cune MS; Carlsson GE Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2005 Oct; 112(10):363-7. PubMed ID: 16300321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population. Awad MA; Lund JP; Shapiro SH; Locker D; Klemetti E; Chehade A; Savard A; Feine JS Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 12956494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus conventional dentures: 10 years of care and aftercare. Visser A; Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 16752625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Immediate provisional implants as abutments for an overdenture in the mandibular edentulous jaw: case presentation. Ravasini T; Marinello CP Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 14(8):673-7; quiz 678. PubMed ID: 12415884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants. Walton JN; Glick N; Macentee MI Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):331-9. PubMed ID: 19639067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Building on the proceedings of the McGill conference: implant-retained overdentures in an area of South America. Markiewicz MR; Marincola M; Tovar LA; Margarone JE; Garlapo DA; Chuang SK Implant Dent; 2008 Sep; 17(3):288-98. PubMed ID: 18784529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized prospective clinical trial on the effectiveness of three treatment modalities for patients with lower denture problems. A 10 year follow-up study on patient satisfaction. Raghoebar GM; Meijer HJ; van 't Hof M; Stegenga B; Vissink A Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Oct; 32(5):498-503. PubMed ID: 14759108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mandibular overdentures: a review of treatment philosophy and prosthodontic maintenance. Al-Zubeidi MI; Payne AG N Z Dent J; 2007 Dec; 103(4):88-97. PubMed ID: 18159719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A cost comparison of mandibular two-implant overdenture and conventional denture treatment. Takanashi Y; Penrod JR; Lund JP; Feine JS Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 15119869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prosthetic treatment time and satisfaction of edentulous patients treated with conventional or implant-stabilized complete mandibular dentures: a case-control study (part 2). Hobkirk JA; Abdel-Latif HH; Howlett J; Welfare R; Moles DR Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 19260422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial. Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The McGill Consensus Statement on Overdentures. Montreal, Quebec, Canada. May 24-25, 2002. Feine JS; Carlsson GE; Awad MA; Chehade A; Duncan WJ; Gizani S; Head T; Lund JP; MacEntee M; Mericske-Stern R; Mojon P; Morais J; Naert I; Payne AG; Penrod J; Stoker GT; Tawse-Smith A; Taylor TD; Thomason JM; Thomson WM; Wismeijer D Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):413-4. PubMed ID: 12170858 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Restoration with implants in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa and patient satisfaction with the implant-supported superstructure. Peñarrocha M; Larrazábal C; Balaguer J; Serrano C; Silvestre J; Bagán JV Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):651-5. PubMed ID: 17929528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]