82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15113069)
1. Structure-activity approach to the identification of environmental estrogens: the MCASE approach.
Cunningham AR; Cunningham SL; Rosenkranz HS
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2004 Feb; 15(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 15113069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An integrated "4-phase" approach for setting endocrine disruption screening priorities--phase I and II predictions of estrogen receptor binding affinity.
Shi L; Tong W; Fang H; Xie Q; Hong H; Perkins R; Wu J; Tu M; Blair RM; Branham WS; Waller C; Walker J; Sheehan DM
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2002 Mar; 13(1):69-88. PubMed ID: 12074393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Molecular modeling for screening environmental chemicals for estrogenicity: use of the toxicant-target approach.
Rabinowitz JR; Little SB; Laws SC; Goldsmith MR
Chem Res Toxicol; 2009 Sep; 22(9):1594-602. PubMed ID: 19715353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Environmental estrogenic effects of alkylphenol ethoxylates.
Nimrod AC; Benson WH
Crit Rev Toxicol; 1996 May; 26(3):335-64. PubMed ID: 8726166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Volume learning algorithm significantly improved PLS model for predicting the estrogenic activity of xenoestrogens.
Kovalishyn VV; Kholodovych V; Tetko IV; Welsh WJ
J Mol Graph Model; 2007 Sep; 26(2):591-4. PubMed ID: 17433745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Uncertainties for endocrine disrupters: our view on progress.
Daston GP; Cook JC; Kavlock RJ
Toxicol Sci; 2003 Aug; 74(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 12730617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Environmental pollutants with hormonal effects. Is estrogen theory a good model?].
Ringvold S; Røttingen JA
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1997 Jan; 117(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 9064814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In silico screening of estrogen-like chemicals based on different nonlinear classification models.
Liu H; Papa E; Walker JD; Gramatica P
J Mol Graph Model; 2007 Jul; 26(1):135-44. PubMed ID: 17293141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. QSAR prediction of estrogen activity for a large set of diverse chemicals under the guidance of OECD principles.
Liu H; Papa E; Gramatica P
Chem Res Toxicol; 2006 Nov; 19(11):1540-8. PubMed ID: 17112243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of (consensus) kNN QSAR for predicting estrogenic activity in a large diverse set of organic compounds.
Asikainen AH; Ruuskanen J; Tuppurainen KA
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2004 Feb; 15(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 15113066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A reactivity pattern for discrimination of ER agonism and antagonism based on 3-D molecular attributes.
Schmieder P; Koleva Y; Mekenyan O
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2002 Mar; 13(2):353-64. PubMed ID: 12071661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estrogenic and androgenic activity of PCBs, their chlorinated metabolites and other endocrine disruptors estimated with two in vitro yeast assays.
Svobodová K; Placková M; Novotná V; Cajthaml T
Sci Total Environ; 2009 Nov; 407(22):5921-5. PubMed ID: 19716585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Selected aspects of xenoestrogens'mode of action taken from a group of persistent organochlorine compounds ].
Struciński P; Ludwicki JK; Góralczyk K; Czaja K
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2000; 51(3):211-28. PubMed ID: 11138478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estrogenic effects of environmental chemicals: an interspecies comparison.
Olsen CM; Meussen-Elholm ET; Hongslo JK; Stenersen J; Tollefsen KE
Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Jul; 141(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 16099220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of the flow cytometric E-screen assay in screening estrogenicity of pure compounds and environmental samples.
Vanparys C; Depiereux S; Nadzialek S; Robbens J; Blust R; Kestemont P; De Coen W
Sci Total Environ; 2010 Sep; 408(20):4451-60. PubMed ID: 20633926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of weak estrogenic flavonoids using a recombinant yeast strain and a modified MCF7 cell proliferation assay.
Breinholt V; Larsen JC
Chem Res Toxicol; 1998 Jun; 11(6):622-9. PubMed ID: 9625730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The utility of structure-activity relationship (SAR) models for prediction and covariate selection in developmental toxicity: comparative analysis of logistic regression and decision tree models.
Arena VC; Sussman NB; Mazumdar S; Yu S; Macina OT
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2004 Feb; 15(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 15113065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of environmental estrogenic chemicals on AP1 mediated transcription with estrogen receptors alpha and beta.
Fujimoto N; Kitamura S
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol; 2004 Jan; 88(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 15026083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Molecular markers of endocrine disruption in aquatic organisms.
Rotchell JM; Ostrander GK
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(5):453-96. PubMed ID: 12888444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hydroxylated polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) as estrogens and antiestrogens: structure-activity relationships.
Connor K; Ramamoorthy K; Moore M; Mustain M; Chen I; Safe S; Zacharewski T; Gillesby B; Joyeux A; Balaguer P
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 1997 Jul; 145(1):111-23. PubMed ID: 9221830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
