These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15113402)

  • 1. Improving the statistical detection of regulated genes from microarray data using intensity-based variance estimation.
    Comander J; Natarajan S; Gimbrone MA; García-Cardeña G
    BMC Genomics; 2004 Feb; 5(1):17. PubMed ID: 15113402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rosetta error model for gene expression analysis.
    Weng L; Dai H; Zhan Y; He Y; Stepaniants SB; Bassett DE
    Bioinformatics; 2006 May; 22(9):1111-21. PubMed ID: 16522673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing three methods for variance estimation with duplicated high density oligonucleotide arrays.
    Huang X; Pan W
    Funct Integr Genomics; 2002 Aug; 2(3):126-33. PubMed ID: 12185460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of microarray data using Z score transformation.
    Cheadle C; Vawter MP; Freed WJ; Becker KG
    J Mol Diagn; 2003 May; 5(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 12707371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Leveraging two-way probe-level block design for identifying differential gene expression with high-density oligonucleotide arrays.
    Barrera L; Benner C; Tao YC; Winzeler E; Zhou Y
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Apr; 5():42. PubMed ID: 15099405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variance component estimation for mixed model analysis of cDNA microarray data.
    Sarholz B; Piepho HP
    Biom J; 2008 Dec; 50(6):927-39. PubMed ID: 19035549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new non-linear normalization method for reducing variability in DNA microarray experiments.
    Workman C; Jensen LJ; Jarmer H; Berka R; Gautier L; Nielser HB; Saxild HH; Nielsen C; Brunak S; Knudsen S
    Genome Biol; 2002 Aug; 3(9):research0048. PubMed ID: 12225587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. EVE (external variance estimation) increases statistical power for detecting differentially expressed genes.
    Wille A; Gruissem W; Bühlmann P; Hennig L
    Plant J; 2007 Nov; 52(3):561-9. PubMed ID: 17680783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intensity-based hierarchical Bayes method improves testing for differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments.
    Sartor MA; Tomlinson CR; Wesselkamper SC; Sivaganesan S; Leikauf GD; Medvedovic M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 7():538. PubMed ID: 17177995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical analysis of microarray data: a Bayesian approach.
    Gottardo R; Pannucci JA; Kuske CR; Brettin T
    Biostatistics; 2003 Oct; 4(4):597-620. PubMed ID: 14557114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variance stabilization applied to microarray data calibration and to the quantification of differential expression.
    Huber W; von Heydebreck A; Sültmann H; Poustka A; Vingron M
    Bioinformatics; 2002; 18 Suppl 1():S96-104. PubMed ID: 12169536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Utilization of a labeled tracking oligonucleotide for visualization and quality control of spotted 70-mer arrays.
    Hessner MJ; Singh VK; Wang X; Khan S; Tschannen MR; Zahrt TC
    BMC Genomics; 2004 Feb; 5(1):12. PubMed ID: 15018646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An assessment of recently published gene expression data analyses: reporting experimental design and statistical factors.
    Jafari P; Azuaje F
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2006 Jun; 6():27. PubMed ID: 16790051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Replication, variation and normalisation in microarray experiments.
    Altman N
    Appl Bioinformatics; 2005; 4(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 16000011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Universal Reference RNA as a standard for microarray experiments.
    Novoradovskaya N; Whitfield ML; Basehore LS; Novoradovsky A; Pesich R; Usary J; Karaca M; Wong WK; Aprelikova O; Fero M; Perou CM; Botstein D; Braman J
    BMC Genomics; 2004 Mar; 5(1):20. PubMed ID: 15113400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The limits of log-ratios.
    Sharov V; Kwong KY; Frank B; Chen E; Hasseman J; Gaspard R; Yu Y; Yang I; Quackenbush J
    BMC Biotechnol; 2004 Mar; 4():3. PubMed ID: 15113428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A simple method for statistical analysis of intensity differences in microarray-derived gene expression data.
    Kamb A; Ramaswami M
    BMC Biotechnol; 2001; 1():8. PubMed ID: 11690545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
    Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CLEAR-test: combining inference for differential expression and variability in microarray data analysis.
    Valls J; Grau M; Solé X; Hernández P; Montaner D; Dopazo J; Peinado MA; Capellá G; Moreno V; Pujana MA
    J Biomed Inform; 2008 Feb; 41(1):33-45. PubMed ID: 17597009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data.
    Xie Y; Pan W; Khodursky AB
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4280-8. PubMed ID: 16188930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.