These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15114998)

  • 1. EEOC v. BNSF: the risks and rewards of genetic exceptionalism.
    Fink S
    Washburn Law J; 2003; 42(3):525-34. PubMed ID: 15114998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is there a pink slip in my gene? Genetic discrimination in the workplace.
    Miller PS
    J Health Care Law Policy; 2000; 3(2):225-65. PubMed ID: 15015481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An equality paradigm for preventing genetic discrimination.
    Silvers A; Stein MA
    Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2002 Oct; 55(5):1341-95. PubMed ID: 15732209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The allure and peril of genetics exceptionalism: do we need special genetics legislation?
    Suter SM
    Wash Univ Law Q; 2001; 79(3):669-748. PubMed ID: 12741377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic disability: a modest proposal to modify the ADA to protect against some forms of genetic discrimination.
    Chorpening J
    North Carol Law Rev; 2004 May; 82(4):1441-81. PubMed ID: 16437812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic justice: discrimination by employers and insurance companies based on predictive genetic information.
    Ellis AM
    Tex Tech Law Rev; 2003; 34(4):1071-99. PubMed ID: 15568280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Whose genetic information is it anyway? A legal analysis of the effects that mapping the human genome will have on privacy rights and genetic discrimination.
    McLochlin DL
    John Marshall J Comput Inf Law; 2001; 19(4):609-46. PubMed ID: 16331878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Federal genetic nondiscrimination legislation: the new "right" and the race to protect DNA at the local, state, and federal level.
    Hathaway KA
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 2002; 52(1):133-77. PubMed ID: 16493794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Senate sends to House a bill on safeguarding genetic privacy.
    Stolberg SG
    N Y Times Web; 2003 Oct; ():A12. PubMed ID: 14610769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The right to genetic privacy? Are we unlocking the secrets of the human genome only to risk insurance and employment discrimination?
    Smith N
    Utah Law Rev; 2000; 2000(3):705-58. PubMed ID: 12718305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic testing and discrimination: how private is your information?
    Slaughter LM
    Stanford Law Pol Rev; 2006; 17(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 17165231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advocates, legislators gear up for battle in the fight to keep genetic information, testing secure from employers, insurers.
    Benko LB
    Mod Healthc; 2007 Apr; 37(14):6-7, 12, 14 passim. PubMed ID: 17444260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Genetic Nondiscrimination in Health Insurance and Employment Act: H.R. 602.
    Slaughter L
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 2001; 18(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 12962107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genetic discrimination, genetic privacy: rethinking employee protections for a brave new workplace.
    Kim PT
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 2002; 96(4):1497-551. PubMed ID: 15162815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spider silk jeans or spider silk genes? The future of genetic testing in the workplace.
    Feitshans IL
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 2001; 18(1):13-49. PubMed ID: 12962108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The elderly and the discriminatory use of genetic information.
    French KG
    Elder Law J; 1997; 5():E1-E29. PubMed ID: 16521318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genotype discrimination: the complex case for some legislative protection.
    Greely HT
    Univ PA Law Rev; 2001 May; 149(5):1483-1505. PubMed ID: 15732207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. From laboratories to legislatures ... legislating in the genomic age is harder than policymakers ever thought.
    Calvo C
    State Legis; 2001 Sep; 27(8):26-9. PubMed ID: 11936165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "Knickel" and dime issues: an unexplored loophole in New York's genetic discrimination statute and the viability of genetic testing in the sports employment context.
    Trumble PD
    Albany Law Rev; 2007; 70(2):771-93. PubMed ID: 17486717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unemployable genes: genetic discrimination in the workplace.
    Gardner-Hopkins JD
    Auckl Univ Law Rev; 2001; 9(2):435-68. PubMed ID: 12755145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.