These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15115009)

  • 1. A sketch of L'avenir de la nature humaine.
    Habermas J
    APA Newsl Philos Med; 2003; 3(1):155-7. PubMed ID: 15115009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Remarks on Habermas's presentation of "L'avenir de la nature humaine".
    Lafont C
    APA Newsl Philos Med; 2003; 3(1):157-60. PubMed ID: 15115010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interventions in the human genome.
    McLean SA
    Mod Law Rev; 1998 Sep; 61(5):681-96. PubMed ID: 14518447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Design constraints for the post-human future.
    Grey W
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 2005 Apr; 24(2):10-9. PubMed ID: 16208842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The post-humanist embryo: genetic manipulation, assisted reproductive technologies and the Principle of Procreative Beneficence.
    Güell Pelayo F
    Cuad Bioet; 2014; 25(85):427-43. PubMed ID: 25684382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Triumph or tragedy? The moral meaning of genetic technology.
    Kass LR
    Am J Jurisprud; 2000; 45():1-16. PubMed ID: 16437775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The protection of the human embryo in vitro. Report by the Working Party of the Human Embryo and Fetus.
    Council of Europe. Steering Committee on Bioethics
    Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2004; 10(1):5-35. PubMed ID: 15459990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Knowledge without wisdom: human genetic engineering without religious insight.
    FitzGerald KT
    Christ Bioeth; 2002 Aug; 8(2):147-62. PubMed ID: 12678035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Defending eugenics : From cryptic choice to conscious selection.
    Anomaly J
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 2018 Jul; 35(1-4):24-35. PubMed ID: 29804244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Germ-line enhancement of humans and non-humans.
    Loftis JR
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2005 Mar; 15(1):57-76. PubMed ID: 15881796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Humanitas and the human genome: a guiding principle for decision making.
    Lagay F
    Free Inq; 2002-2003 Winter; 23(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 16208835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis, stem cells and Jewish law.
    Broyde MJ
    Tradition; 2004; 38(1):54-75. PubMed ID: 15856576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cross-generational retribution and genetic engineering: reflections on chance and free will.
    Troster L
    Conserv Jud; 2002; 54(3):33-41. PubMed ID: 12735299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Human brain cells in animal brains: philosophical and moral considerations.
    Berg T
    Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2006; 6(1):89-107. PubMed ID: 17037494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Beneficence, determinism and justice: an engagement with the argument for the genetic selection of intelligence.
    Birch K
    Bioethics; 2005 Feb; 19(1):12-28. PubMed ID: 15812970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genes, justice, and obligations to future people.
    Kamm FM
    Soc Philos Policy; 2002; 19(2):360-88. PubMed ID: 12678094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Liberty, identity, and human cloning.
    Robertson JA
    Tex Law Rev; 1998 May; 76(6):1371-456. PubMed ID: 11660439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Behavioural genetics: why eugenic selection is preferable to enhancement.
    Savulescu J; Hemsley M; Newson A; Foddy B
    J Appl Philos; 2006; 23(2):157-71. PubMed ID: 17036429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetics and human behaviour: the ethical context--summary and recommendations.
    Nuffield Council on Bioethics
    J Int Bioethique; 2003; 14(3-4):171-92. PubMed ID: 15281207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An ambiguity in Habermas's argument against liberal eugenics.
    Schäfer LP
    Bioethics; 2019 Nov; 33(9):1059-1064. PubMed ID: 31463995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.