These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15115041)
1. The importance of knowing where you are. Nelson JL Perspectives Prof; 2000; 20(1):E4. PubMed ID: 15115041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cancer research and therapy: a view from Norway. Ruyter KW Perspectives Prof; 2000; 20(1):E5. PubMed ID: 15115042 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical trials of cancer therapy: a personal narrative. Sawyier F Perspectives Prof; 2000; 20(1):E2. PubMed ID: 15115039 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical trials of cancer therapy: a social worker's view. Wolf MS Perspectives Prof; 2000; 20(1):E3. PubMed ID: 15115040 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In the face of death: four ethical issues. Ozar DT Perspectives Prof; 2000; 20(1):E6. PubMed ID: 15115043 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ethics in phase II trials of cancer therapies. Davis M Perspectives Prof; 2000; 20(1):E1. PubMed ID: 15115038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Endings of clinical research protocols: distinguishing therapy from research. Grinnell F IRB; 1990; 12(4):1-3. PubMed ID: 11651260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient or guinea pig? Dilemma of clinical trials. Grady D N Y Times Web; 1999 Jan; ():F1, F4. PubMed ID: 11647579 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethics and placebo-controlled thrombolytic trials: the future. Freedman B Coron Artery Dis; 1991 Sep; 2(7):849-52. PubMed ID: 11659532 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Research versus innovation: real differences. Morreim H Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):42-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036658 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Informed consent for a clinical trial in Thailand. Achrekar A; Gupta R N Engl J Med; 1998 Oct; 339(18):1331-2. PubMed ID: 9841301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Rate of refusal to participate in clinical trials. Shimm DS; Spece RG IRB; 1992; 14(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11651246 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The right of subjects to see the protocol. Veatch RM IRB; 2002; 24(5):6-8. PubMed ID: 12737168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Protocol review within the context of a research program. Miller FG; Rosenstein DL IRB; 1998; 20(4):7-10. PubMed ID: 11657088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Research ethics and clinical trials: fostering collaboration with research participants. Phipps E; Fleetwood J; Piraino A Account Res; 1999; 6(3):215-26. PubMed ID: 11658125 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Conflict of interest and informed consent in industry-sponsored clinical trials. Shimm DS; Spece RG J Leg Med; 1991 Dec; 12(4):477-513. PubMed ID: 1800586 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Informed consent and medical experimentation. Martin GH Iustitia; 1975; 3(1):29-58. PubMed ID: 11665229 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Time to stop worrying about the therapeutic misconception. Wendler DS J Clin Ethics; 2012; 23(3):272-87. PubMed ID: 23256408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The therapeutic misconception, beneficence, and respect. Fried E Account Res; 2001; 8(4):331-48. PubMed ID: 12481794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Toward achieving meaningful informed consent in AIDS vaccine trials with injection-drug users. Sugarman J AIDS Public Policy J; 1994; 9(4):167-72. PubMed ID: 11654294 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]