These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

370 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15115393)

  • 1. Conformational analysis of drug-like molecules bound to proteins: an extensive study of ligand reorganization upon binding.
    Perola E; Charifson PS
    J Med Chem; 2004 May; 47(10):2499-510. PubMed ID: 15115393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Torsion angle preference and energetics of small-molecule ligands bound to proteins.
    Hao MH; Haq O; Muegge I
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(6):2242-52. PubMed ID: 17880058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. HierVLS hierarchical docking protocol for virtual ligand screening of large-molecule databases.
    Floriano WB; Vaidehi N; Zamanakos G; Goddard WA
    J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(1):56-71. PubMed ID: 14695820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Structural parameterization of the binding enthalpy of small ligands.
    Luque I; Freire E
    Proteins; 2002 Nov; 49(2):181-90. PubMed ID: 12210999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accurate assessment of the strain energy in a protein-bound drug using QM/MM X-ray refinement and converged quantum chemistry.
    Fu Z; Li X; Merz KM
    J Comput Chem; 2011 Sep; 32(12):2587-97. PubMed ID: 21598285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conformational diversity of ligands bound to proteins.
    Stockwell GR; Thornton JM
    J Mol Biol; 2006 Mar; 356(4):928-44. PubMed ID: 16405908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative analysis of protein-bound ligand conformations with respect to catalyst's conformational space subsampling algorithms.
    Kirchmair J; Laggner C; Wolber G; Langer T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(2):422-30. PubMed ID: 15807508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toward accurate relative energy predictions of the bioactive conformation of drugs.
    Butler KT; Luque FJ; Barril X
    J Comput Chem; 2009 Mar; 30(4):601-10. PubMed ID: 18711721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An all atom energy based computational protocol for predicting binding affinities of protein-ligand complexes.
    Jain T; Jayaram B
    FEBS Lett; 2005 Dec; 579(29):6659-66. PubMed ID: 16307743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mapping the energetics of water-protein and water-ligand interactions with the "natural" HINT forcefield: predictive tools for characterizing the roles of water in biomolecules.
    Amadasi A; Spyrakis F; Cozzini P; Abraham DJ; Kellogg GE; Mozzarelli A
    J Mol Biol; 2006 Apr; 358(1):289-309. PubMed ID: 16497327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relaxed complex method: Accommodating receptor flexibility for drug design with an improved scoring scheme.
    Lin JH; Perryman AL; Schames JR; McCammon JA
    Biopolymers; 2003 Jan; 68(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 12579579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A robust force field based method for calculating conformational energies of charged drug-like molecules.
    Poehlsgaard J; Harpsøe K; Jørgensen FS; Olsen L
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Feb; 52(2):409-19. PubMed ID: 21985436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contribution of conformer focusing to the uncertainty in predicting free energies for protein-ligand binding.
    Tirado-Rives J; Jorgensen WL
    J Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 49(20):5880-4. PubMed ID: 17004703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hydration properties of ligands and drugs in protein binding sites: tightly-bound, bridging water molecules and their effects and consequences on molecular design strategies.
    García-Sosa AT
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jun; 53(6):1388-405. PubMed ID: 23662606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Molecular modeling of hydration in drug design.
    Mancera RL
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2007 May; 10(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 17554853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Direct calculation of the binding free energies of FKBP ligands.
    Fujitani H; Tanida Y; Ito M; Jayachandran G; Snow CD; Shirts MR; Sorin EJ; Pande VS
    J Chem Phys; 2005 Aug; 123(8):084108. PubMed ID: 16164283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Carbohydrate-binding proteins: Dissecting ligand structures through solvent environment occupancy.
    Gauto DF; Di Lella S; Guardia CM; Estrin DA; Martí MA
    J Phys Chem B; 2009 Jun; 113(25):8717-24. PubMed ID: 19485380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determination of atomic desolvation energies from the structures of crystallized proteins.
    Zhang C; Vasmatzis G; Cornette JL; DeLisi C
    J Mol Biol; 1997 Apr; 267(3):707-26. PubMed ID: 9126848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Structural mining: self-consistent design on flexible protein-peptide docking and transferable binding affinity potential.
    Liu Z; Dominy BN; Shakhnovich EI
    J Am Chem Soc; 2004 Jul; 126(27):8515-28. PubMed ID: 15238009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physics-based methods for studying protein-ligand interactions.
    Huang N; Jacobson MP
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2007 May; 10(3):325-31. PubMed ID: 17554859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.