These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15116348)

  • 1. GEE approaches to marginal regression models for medical diagnostic tests.
    Martus P; Stroux A; Jünemann AM; Korth M; Jonas JB; Horn FK; Ziegler A
    Stat Med; 2004 May; 23(9):1377-98. PubMed ID: 15116348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A note on fitting a marginal model to mixed effects log-linear regression data via GEE.
    Grömping U
    Biometrics; 1996 Mar; 52(1):280-5. PubMed ID: 8934596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficient parameter estimation in longitudinal data analysis using a hybrid GEE method.
    Leung DH; Wang YG; Zhu M
    Biostatistics; 2009 Jul; 10(3):436-45. PubMed ID: 19346528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of generalized estimating equations to a study of in vitro radiation sensitivity.
    Cologne JB; Carter RL; Fujita S; Ban S
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):927-34. PubMed ID: 8241379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Group sequential large sample T2-like chi2 tests for multivariate observations.
    Lachin JM; Greenhouse SW; Bautista OM
    Stat Med; 2003 Nov; 22(21):3357-68. PubMed ID: 14566920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Traditional and innovative diagnostic tools: when and why they should be applied].
    Cancrini G; Iori A
    Parassitologia; 2004 Jun; 46(1-2):173-6. PubMed ID: 15305711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies accounting for disease prevalence: alternative parameterizations and model selection.
    Chu H; Nie L; Cole SR; Poole C
    Stat Med; 2009 Aug; 28(18):2384-99. PubMed ID: 19499551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian ranking of sites for engineering safety improvements: decision parameter, treatability concept, statistical criterion, and spatial dependence.
    Miaou SP; Song JJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2005 Jul; 37(4):699-720. PubMed ID: 15949462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of diagnostic scores with adjustment for covariates.
    Berres M; Zehnder A; Bläsi S; Monsch AU
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1777-90. PubMed ID: 17968872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Diagnostic kits in parasitology: which controls?].
    Rossi P
    Parassitologia; 2004 Jun; 46(1-2):145-9. PubMed ID: 15305705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploring the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 diagnostic accuracy across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study.
    Oddone F; Centofanti M; Rossetti L; Iester M; Fogagnolo P; Capris E; Manni G
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Aug; 115(8):1358-65, 1365.e1-3. PubMed ID: 18321579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A generalized estimating equations approach for testing ordered group effects with repeated measurements.
    Park T; Shin DW; Park CG
    Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1645-53. PubMed ID: 9883556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sector-based analysis with the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study.
    Oddone F; Centofanti M; Iester M; Rossetti L; Fogagnolo P; Michelessi M; Capris E; Manni G
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1106-11.e1-3. PubMed ID: 19376590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Derivation and evaluation of a termination of resuscitation clinical prediction rule for advanced life support providers.
    Morrison LJ; Verbeek PR; Vermeulen MJ; Kiss A; Allan KS; Nesbitt L; Stiell I
    Resuscitation; 2007 Aug; 74(2):266-75. PubMed ID: 17383072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Economic consequences of near-patient test results: the case of tests for the Helicobacter Pylori bacterium in dyspepsia.
    Fauli S; Thue G
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Aug; 9(3):221-8. PubMed ID: 17570004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of several approaches for choosing between working correlation structures in generalized estimating equation analysis of longitudinal binary data.
    Shults J; Sun W; Tu X; Kim H; Amsterdam J; Hilbe JM; Ten-Have T
    Stat Med; 2009 Aug; 28(18):2338-55. PubMed ID: 19472307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The sensitivity and specificity of markers for event times.
    Cai T; Pepe MS; Zheng Y; Lumley T; Jenny NS
    Biostatistics; 2006 Apr; 7(2):182-97. PubMed ID: 16079162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated analysis of heidelberg retina tomograph optic disc images by glaucoma probability score.
    Coops A; Henson DB; Kwartz AJ; Artes PH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5348-55. PubMed ID: 17122123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic ability of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 classifications: glaucoma probability score versus Moorfields regression analysis.
    Ferreras A; Pajarín AB; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Honrubia FM
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Nov; 114(11):1981-7. PubMed ID: 17445899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sample size determination for constrained longitudinal data analysis.
    Lu K; Mehrotra DV; Liu G
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):679-99. PubMed ID: 19051207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.