298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15116900)
1. Development and experimental validation of a three-dimensional finite element model of the human scapula.
Gupta S; van der Helm FC; Sterk JC; van Keulen F; Kaptein BL
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2004; 218(2):127-42. PubMed ID: 15116900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Subject-specific finite element model of the pelvis: development, validation and sensitivity studies.
Anderson AE; Peters CL; Tuttle BD; Weiss JA
J Biomech Eng; 2005 Jun; 127(3):364-73. PubMed ID: 16060343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A 3D finite element model of an implanted scapula: importance of a multiparametric validation using experimental data.
Maurel N; Diop A; Grimberg J
J Biomech; 2005 Sep; 38(9):1865-72. PubMed ID: 16023474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experimental validation of a finite element model of a human cadaveric tibia.
Gray HA; Taddei F; Zavatsky AB; Cristofolini L; Gill HS
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Jun; 130(3):031016. PubMed ID: 18532865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method.
Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsuyama J; Matsumoto T; Imai K; Nakamura K
J Biomech; 2007; 40(8):1745-53. PubMed ID: 17034798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computed-tomography-based finite-element models of long bones can accurately capture strain response to bending and torsion.
Varghese B; Short D; Penmetsa R; Goswami T; Hangartner T
J Biomech; 2011 Apr; 44(7):1374-9. PubMed ID: 21288523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of boundary condition on the biomechanics of a human pelvic joint under an axial compressive load: a three-dimensional finite element model.
Hao Z; Wan C; Gao X; Ji T
J Biomech Eng; 2011 Oct; 133(10):101006. PubMed ID: 22070331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Finite element modeling of the human thoracolumbar spine.
Liebschner MA; Kopperdahl DL; Rosenberg WS; Keaveny TM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Mar; 28(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 12642762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of a finite element model of the human metacarpal.
Barker DS; Netherway DJ; Krishnan J; Hearn TC
Med Eng Phys; 2005 Mar; 27(2):103-13. PubMed ID: 15642506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Micro-finite element simulation of trabecular-bone post-yield behaviour--effects of material model, element size and type.
Verhulp E; Van Rietbergen B; Muller R; Huiskes R
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2008 Aug; 11(4):389-95. PubMed ID: 18568833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experimental validation of a finite element model of a composite tibia.
Gray HA; Zavatsky AB; Taddei F; Cristofolini L; Gill HS
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2007 Apr; 221(3):315-24. PubMed ID: 17539586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliable simulations of the human proximal femur by high-order finite element analysis validated by experimental observations.
Yosibash Z; Trabelsi N; Milgrom C
J Biomech; 2007; 40(16):3688-99. PubMed ID: 17706228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rib fractures under anterior-posterior dynamic loads: experimental and finite-element study.
Li Z; Kindig MW; Kerrigan JR; Untaroiu CD; Subit D; Crandall JR; Kent RW
J Biomech; 2010 Jan; 43(2):228-34. PubMed ID: 19875122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experimental validation of finite element model for proximal composite femur using optical measurements.
Grassi L; Väänänen SP; Amin Yavari S; Weinans H; Jurvelin JS; Zadpoor AA; Isaksson H
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 May; 21():86-94. PubMed ID: 23510970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A CT-based high-order finite element analysis of the human proximal femur compared to in-vitro experiments.
Yosibash Z; Padan R; Joskowicz L; Milgrom C
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Jun; 129(3):297-309. PubMed ID: 17536896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Establishment of an architecture-specific experimental validation approach for finite element modeling of bone by rapid prototyping and high resolution computed tomography.
Su R; Campbell GM; Boyd SK
Med Eng Phys; 2007 May; 29(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 16908211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional finite element models of the human pubic symphysis with viscohyperelastic soft tissues.
Li Z; Alonso JE; Kim JE; Davidson JS; Etheridge BS; Eberhardt AW
Ann Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 34(9):1452-62. PubMed ID: 16897423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the linear finite element prediction of deformation and strain of human cancellous bone to 3D digital volume correlation measurements.
Zauel R; Yeni YN; Bay BK; Dong XN; Fyhrie DP
J Biomech Eng; 2006 Feb; 128(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 16532610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Load transfer across the scapula during humeral abduction.
Gupta S; van der Helm FC
J Biomech; 2004 Jul; 37(7):1001-9. PubMed ID: 15165870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
