These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Absence of attentional capture in parallel search is possible: a failure to replicate attentional capture in a non-singleton target search task. Wienrich C; Janczyk M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2044-52. PubMed ID: 21805210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Active suppression of salient-but-irrelevant stimuli does not underlie resistance to visual interference. Barras C; Kerzel D Biol Psychol; 2016 Dec; 121(Pt A):74-83. PubMed ID: 27756581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A salient distractor does not disrupt conjunction search. Lamy D; Tsal Y Psychon Bull Rev; 1999 Mar; 6(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 12199317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Distractor rejection in visual search breaks down with more than a single distractor feature. Kerzel D; Barras C J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 May; 42(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 26594882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The size of an attentional window modulates attentional capture by color singletons. Belopolsky AV; Zwaan L; Theeuwes J; Kramer AF Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Oct; 14(5):934-8. PubMed ID: 18087962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Target uncertainty does not lead to greater singleton distractor interference when target shapes are not interchangeable with nontarget shapes. Berry JH Vision Res; 2013 Mar; 80():31-40. PubMed ID: 23385060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attentional control during visual search: the effect of irrelevant singletons. Theeuwes J; Burger R J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Oct; 24(5):1342-53. PubMed ID: 9778827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spatial filtering restricts the attentional window during both singleton and feature-based visual search. Berggren N; Eimer M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2360-2378. PubMed ID: 31993978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of search mode and intertrial priming on singleton search. Lamy D; Carmel T; Egeth HE; Leber AB Percept Psychophys; 2006 Aug; 68(6):919-32. PubMed ID: 17153188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Top-down search strategies determine attentional capture in visual search: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Eimer M; Kiss M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):951-62. PubMed ID: 20436192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes. Lamy D; Egeth HE J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1003-20. PubMed ID: 14585019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of top-down guidance and singleton priming on visual search. Lamy D; Bar-Anan Y; Egeth HE; Carmel T Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Apr; 13(2):287-93. PubMed ID: 16892996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Search mode, not the attentional window, determines the magnitude of attentional capture. Kerzel D; Huynh Cong S Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Feb; 86(2):457-470. PubMed ID: 36207666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]