These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15116995)

  • 1. Pigeons group time intervals according to their relative duration.
    Zentall TR; Weaver JE; Clement TS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Feb; 11(1):113-7. PubMed ID: 15116995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Representation of time intervals in a double bisection task: relative or absolute?
    Maia S; Machado A
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):280-5. PubMed ID: 19022356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative judgments affect assessments of stimulus duration.
    Molet M; Zentall TR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Apr; 15(2):431-6. PubMed ID: 18488664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Control of pigeons' matching-to-sample performance by differential sample response requirements.
    Hogan DE; Zentall TR; Pace G
    Am J Psychol; 1983; 96(1):37-49. PubMed ID: 6859346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temporal discrimination learning by pigeons.
    Zentall TR
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 17110057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of scopolamine on memory for time in rats and pigeons.
    Santi A; Weise L
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1995; 51(2-3):271-7. PubMed ID: 7667339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of a single-code/default strategy by pigeons to acquire duration sample discriminations.
    Singer RA; Klein ED; Zentall TR
    Learn Behav; 2006 Nov; 34(4):340-7. PubMed ID: 17330523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discrimination of temporal relations by pigeons.
    Dreyfus LR; Fetterman JG; Smith LD; Stubbs DA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1988 Oct; 14(4):349-67. PubMed ID: 3183576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Coding in pigeons: Multiple-coding versus single-code/default strategies.
    Pinto C; Machado A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 May; 103(3):472-83. PubMed ID: 25894105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discrimination of duration ratios by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens).
    Fetterman JG; Dreyfus LR; Stubbs DA
    J Comp Psychol; 1993 Mar; 107(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 8444016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A relational differential outcomes effect: pigeons can classify outcomes as "good" and "better".
    Friedrich AM; Zentall TR
    Anim Cogn; 2010 Mar; 13(2):359-65. PubMed ID: 19779744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Discrimination of duration ratios.
    Fetterman JG; Dreyfus LR; Stubbs DA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1989 Jul; 15(3):253-63. PubMed ID: 2760563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retrospective coding in pigeons' delayed matching-to-sample.
    Urcuioli PJ; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1986 Jan; 12(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 3701260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Processing of empty and filled time intervals in pigeons.
    Grant DS; Talarico DC
    Learn Behav; 2004 Nov; 32(4):477-90. PubMed ID: 15825888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bisection of temporal intervals by pigeons.
    Platt JR; Davis ER
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1983 Apr; 9(2):160-70. PubMed ID: 6842135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transfer of hue matching in pigeons.
    Urcuioli PJ; Nevin JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1975 Sep; 24(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 1206332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Required pecking alters judgments of the passage of time by pigeons.
    Zentall TR; Friedrich AM; Clement TS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Dec; 13(6):1038-42. PubMed ID: 17484432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do pigeons (Columba livia) study for a test?
    Roberts WA; Feeney MC; McMillan N; MacPherson K; Musolino E; Petter M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):129-42. PubMed ID: 19364222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Training delays reduce the choose-short effect with keylight, but not with food, duration samples in pigeons.
    Grant DS
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 17079092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conditional discrimination with ambiguous stimuli.
    Meltzer D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1983 Mar; 39(2):241-9. PubMed ID: 6842128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.