These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15117006)

  • 1. Randomness and inductions from streaks: "gambler's fallacy" versus "hot hand".
    Burns BD; Corpus B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Feb; 11(1):179-84. PubMed ID: 15117006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting Outcomes in a Sequence of Binary Events: Belief Updating and Gambler's Fallacy Reasoning.
    Rao K; Hastie R
    Cogn Sci; 2023 Jan; 47(1):e13211. PubMed ID: 36680427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The hot hand fallacy and the gambler's fallacy: two faces of subjective randomness?
    Ayton P; Fischer I
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Dec; 32(8):1369-78. PubMed ID: 15900930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The intentional mind and the hot hand: Perceiving intentions makes streaks seem likely to continue.
    Caruso EM; Waytz A; Epley N
    Cognition; 2010 Jul; 116(1):149-53. PubMed ID: 20472229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Culture and gambling fallacies.
    Ji LJ; McGeorge K; Li Y; Lee A; Zhang Z
    Springerplus; 2015; 4():510. PubMed ID: 26405630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Grouping and gambling: a Gestalt approach to understanding the gambler's fallacy.
    Roney CJ; Trick LM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2003 Jun; 57(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 12822837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Motivated reasoning in the prediction of sports outcomes and the belief in the "hot hand".
    Braga JPN; Mata A; Ferreira MB; Sherman SJ
    Cogn Emot; 2017 Dec; 31(8):1571-1580. PubMed ID: 27796170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Losses and External Outcomes Interact to Produce the Gambler's Fallacy.
    Mossbridge JA; Roney CJ; Suzuki S
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170057. PubMed ID: 28125684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The gambler's fallacy in penalty shootouts.
    Braun S; Schmidt U
    Curr Biol; 2015 Jul; 25(14):R597-8. PubMed ID: 26196482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrophysiological correlates of near outcome and outcome sequence processing in problem gamblers and controls.
    Ulrich N; Hewig J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):379-392. PubMed ID: 29111453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An effect of inter-trial duration on the gambler's fallacy choice bias.
    Militana E; Wolfson E; Cleaveland JM
    Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):455-9. PubMed ID: 20176090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Near miss, gambler's fallacy and entrapment: their influence on lottery gamblers in Thailand.
    Ariyabuddhiphongs V; Phengphol V
    J Gambl Stud; 2008 Sep; 24(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 18512133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A fallacious "Gambler's Fallacy"? Commentary on Xu and Harvey (2014).
    Demaree HA; Weaver JS; Juergensen J
    Cognition; 2015 Jun; 139():168-70. PubMed ID: 25242313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impulsivity, gambling cognitions, and the gambler's fallacy in university students.
    Marmurek HH; Switzer J; D'Alvise J
    J Gambl Stud; 2015 Mar; 31(1):197-210. PubMed ID: 24293013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What's next? Judging sequences of binary events.
    Oskarsson AT; Van Boven L; McClelland GH; Hastie R
    Psychol Bull; 2009 Mar; 135(2):262-85. PubMed ID: 19254080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Erroneous gambling-related beliefs as illusions of primary and secondary control: a confirmatory factor analysis.
    Ejova A; Delfabbro PH; Navarro DJ
    J Gambl Stud; 2015 Mar; 31(1):133-60. PubMed ID: 23861012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Extending the two faces of subjective randomness: From the gambler's and hot-hand fallacies toward a hierarchy of binary sequence perception.
    Fischer I; Savranevski L
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Oct; 43(7):1056-70. PubMed ID: 26044942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Who "believes" in the Gambler's Fallacy and why?
    Farmer GD; Warren PA; Hahn U
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Jan; 146(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 28054813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Occurrence and nonoccurrence of random sequences: comment on Hahn and Warren (2009).
    Sun Y; Tweney RD; Wang H
    Psychol Rev; 2010 Apr; 117(2):697-705; discussion 706-11. PubMed ID: 20438245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relatively random: context effects on perceived randomness and predicted outcomes.
    Matthews WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1642-8. PubMed ID: 23356242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.