These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1511762)

  • 1. Comparison between metal cup and silicone rubber cup vacuum extractor.
    Loghis C; Pyrgiotis E; Panayotopoulos N; Batalias L; Salamalekis E; Zourlas PA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1992 Jul; 45(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 1511762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A multicentre randomized trial comparing delivery with a silicone rubber cup and rigid metal vacuum extractor cups.
    Cohn M; Barclay C; Fraser R; Zaklama M; Johanson R; Anderson D; Walker C
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 May; 96(5):545-51. PubMed ID: 2667629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of vacuum extraction delivery between the conventional metal cup and the new soft rubber cup.
    Srisomboon J; Piyamongkol W; Sahapong V; Mongkolchaipak S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1998 Jul; 81(7):480-6. PubMed ID: 9676083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical experience with the Silc Cup Vacuum Extractor.
    Low J; Ng TY; Chew SY
    Singapore Med J; 1993 Apr; 34(2):135-8. PubMed ID: 8266153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized prospective study comparing delivery with metal and silicone rubber vacuum extractor cups.
    Chenoy R; Johanson R
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 May; 99(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 1622904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized comparison of vacuum extraction delivery with a rigid and a pliable cup.
    Kuit JA; Eppinga HG; Wallenburg HC; Huikeshoven FJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Aug; 82(2):280-4. PubMed ID: 8336878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vacuum delivery at The Maternity Hospital Kuala Lumpur: a comparison of metal and silicone cups.
    Lee HY; Subramaniam N; Nordin MM
    Singapore Med J; 1996 Feb; 37(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 8783915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical assessment of the Kobayashi vacuum extractor.
    Maryniak GM; Frank JB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Sep; 64(3):431-5. PubMed ID: 6462575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in vacuum-assisted delivery with the Kiwi OmniCup and Malmström metal cup.
    Turkmen S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Feb; 41(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 25255995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vacuum extraction: a randomized controlled comparison of the New Generation cup with the original Bird cup.
    Carmody F; Grant A; Somchiwong M
    J Perinat Med; 1986; 14(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 3735050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cohort study of silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: I. Safety of the instrument.
    Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown K; Hayashi RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Oct; 66(4):503-9. PubMed ID: 3900836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vacuum extractor: a safe instrument?
    Ngan HY; Tang GW; Ma HK
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Aug; 26(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 3468937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Forceps or vacuum extraction: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity.
    Shihadeh A; Al-Najdawi W
    East Mediterr Health J; 2001; 7(1-2):106-14. PubMed ID: 12596959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison between the conventional Malmström extractor and a new extractor with Silastic cup.
    Hammarström M; Csemiczky G; Belfrage P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1986; 65(7):791-2. PubMed ID: 3544665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomised prospective study comparing the new vacuum extractor policy with forceps delivery.
    Johanson RB; Rice C; Doyle M; Arthur J; Anyanwu L; Ibrahim J; Warwick A; Redman CW; O'Brien PM
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Jun; 100(6):524-30. PubMed ID: 8334086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Soft cup vacuum extraction: a comparison of outlet delivery.
    Dell DL; Sightler SE; Plauché WC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 66(5):624-8. PubMed ID: 4058820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomised controlled trial of two instruments for vacuum-assisted delivery (Vacca Re-Usable OmniCup and the Bird anterior and posterior cups) to compare failure rates, safety and use effectiveness.
    Mola GD; Kuk JM
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Jun; 50(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 20618242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The risk of periventricular-intraventricular hemorrhage with vacuum extraction of neonates weighing 2000 grams or less.
    Thomas SJ; Morgan MA; Asrat T; Weeks JW
    J Perinatol; 1997; 17(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 9069063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of the vacuum extractor.
    Bird GC
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1982 Dec; 9(3):641-61. PubMed ID: 6756751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [A comparison of maternal and fetal complications during operative vaginal delivery using Thierry's spatulas and the vacuum extractor].
    Vanlieferinghen S; Girard G; Mandelbrot L
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2009 Dec; 38(8):648-54. PubMed ID: 19896285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.