206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15118645)
1. First trimester ultrasound screening is effective in reducing postterm labor induction rates: a randomized controlled trial.
Bennett KA; Crane JM; O'shea P; Lacelle J; Hutchens D; Copel JA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Apr; 190(4):1077-81. PubMed ID: 15118645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Induction of labor or serial antenatal fetal monitoring in postterm pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial.
Heimstad R; Skogvoll E; Mattsson LA; Johansen OJ; Eik-Nes SH; Salvesen KA
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Mar; 109(3):609-17. PubMed ID: 17329511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does a first trimester dating scan using crown rump length measurement reduce the rate of induction of labour for prolonged pregnancy? An uncompleted randomised controlled trial of 463 women.
Harrington DJ; MacKenzie IZ; Thompson K; Fleminger M; Greenwood C
BJOG; 2006 Feb; 113(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 16411994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multicenter study of first-trimester screening for trisomy 21 in 75 821 pregnancies: results and estimation of the potential impact of individual risk-orientated two-stage first-trimester screening.
Nicolaides KH; Spencer K; Avgidou K; Faiola S; Falcon O
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 25(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 15736186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. First-trimester screening in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology: significance of gestational dating by oocyte retrieval or sonographic measurement of crown-rump length.
Gjerris AC; Loft A; Pinborg A; Tabor A; Christiansen M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 32(5):612-7. PubMed ID: 18816495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Early fetal size and growth as predictors of adverse outcome.
Pedersen NG; Figueras F; Wøjdemann KR; Tabor A; Gardosi J
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 112(4):765-71. PubMed ID: 18827118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening for Down syndrome using first-trimester combined screening followed by second-trimester ultrasound examination in an unselected population.
Rozenberg P; Bussières L; Chevret S; Bernard JP; Malagrida L; Cuckle H; Chabry C; Durand-Zaleski I; Bidat L; Lacroix I; Moulis M; Roger M; Jacquemot MC; Bault JP; Boukobza P; Boccara P; Vialard F; Giudicelli Y; Ville Y
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 195(5):1379-87. PubMed ID: 16723105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Screening for Down syndrome using first-trimester combined screening followed by second trimester ultrasound examination in an unselected population].
Rozenberg P; Bussières L; Chevret S; Bernard JP; Malagrida L; Cuckle H; Chabry C; Durand-Zaleski I; Bidat L; Lacroix I; Moulis M; Roger M; Jacquemot MC; Bault JP; Boukobza P; Boccara P; Vialat F; Giudicelli Y; Ville Y
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Apr; 35(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 17350315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of delivery date by sonography in the first and second trimesters.
Olesen AW; Thomsen SG
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 28(3):292-7. PubMed ID: 16865679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new approach to calculating the risk of chromosomal abnormalities with first-trimester screening data.
Merz E; Thode C; Alkier A; Eiben B; Hackelöer BJ; Hansmann M; Huesgen G; Kozlowski P; Pruggmaier M; Wellek S
Ultraschall Med; 2008 Dec; 29(6):639-45. PubMed ID: 19085755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical significance of first trimester crown-rump length disparity in dichorionic twin gestations.
Kalish RB; Gupta M; Perni SC; Berman S; Chasen ST
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 191(4):1437-40. PubMed ID: 15507979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Economic modelling of antenatal screening and ultrasound scanning programmes for identification of fetal abnormalities.
Ritchie K; Bradbury I; Slattery J; Wright D; Iqbal K; Penney G
BJOG; 2005 Jul; 112(7):866-74. PubMed ID: 15957985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness model for first-trimester versus second-trimester ultrasound screening for Down syndrome.
Kott B; Dubinsky TJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jun; 1(6):415-21. PubMed ID: 17411619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Routine ultrasound fetal examination in pregnancy: the 'Alesund' randomized controlled trial.
Eik-Nes SH; Salvesen KA; Okland O; Vatten LJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 15(6):473-8. PubMed ID: 11005114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. First- and second-trimester ultrasound assessment of gestational age.
Kalish RB; Thaler HT; Chasen ST; Gupta M; Berman SJ; Rosenwaks Z; Chervenak FA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Sep; 191(3):975-8. PubMed ID: 15467575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Dating biometry with crown-rump length, precision of a routine practice].
Grange G; Pannier E; Goffinet F; Zorn JR; Cabrol D
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2003; 32(3 Pt 1):221-6. PubMed ID: 12773924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. First- and second-trimester screening: detection of aneuploidies other than Down syndrome.
Breathnach FM; Malone FD; Lambert-Messerlian G; Cuckle HS; Porter TF; Nyberg DA; Comstock CH; Saade GR; Berkowitz RL; Klugman S; Dugoff L; Craigo SD; Timor-Tritsch IE; Carr SR; Wolfe HM; Tripp T; Bianchi DW; D'Alton ME;
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):651-7. PubMed ID: 17766613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Duration and variability of normal pregnancy. Implications for clinical practice.
Mongelli M; Opatola B
J Reprod Med; 1995 Sep; 40(9):645-8. PubMed ID: 8576881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Women as moral pioneers? Experiences of first trimester antenatal screening.
Williams C; Sandall J; Lewando-Hundt G; Heyman B; Spencer K; Grellier R
Soc Sci Med; 2005 Nov; 61(9):1983-92. PubMed ID: 15899542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accurate gestational dating: revisited.
Ott WJ
Am J Perinatol; 1994 Nov; 11(6):404-8. PubMed ID: 7857430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
