224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15119320)
1. Dementia research: ethics and policy for the twenty-first century.
Dresser R
Georgia Law Rev; 2001; 35(2):661-90. PubMed ID: 15119320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Advance directives in dementia research: promoting autonomy and protecting subjects.
Dresser R
IRB; 2001; 23(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 12530449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Why the tolerance of potential harms? Research ethics in Alzheimer disease.
Post SG
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):241-53. PubMed ID: 11658179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Anticipatory planning for research participants with psychotic disorders like schizophrenia.
Backlar P
Psychol Public Policy Law; 1998 Sep; 4(3):829-53. PubMed ID: 12807102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Guidelines for addressing ethical and legal issues in Alzheimer disease research: a position paper.
High DM; Whitehouse PJ; Post SG; Berg L
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord; 1994; 8(Suppl. 4):66-74. PubMed ID: 11657676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Children as research subjects: a proposal to revise the current federal regulations using a moral framework.
Ross LF
Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1997; 8(1):159-76. PubMed ID: 16528858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Planning for future research participation: ethical and practical considerations.
Dresser R
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):129-36. PubMed ID: 11658171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Research involving persons with mental disorders that may affect decisionmaking capacity--executive summary.
US National Bioethics Advisory Commission
J Int Bioethique; 2002 Mar; 13(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 15038373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Research involving persons with mental disorders that may affect decisionmaking capacity.
National Bioethics Advisory Commission (United States)
J Int Bioethique; 2002; 13(3-4):173-9. PubMed ID: 12747354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Proxy consent to participation of the decisionally impaired in medical resesarch--Maryland's policy initiative.
Hoffman DE; Schwartz J
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):123-53. PubMed ID: 15573434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Achieving proper balance in research with decisionally-incapacitated subjects: NAMI's perspectives on the working group's proposal.
Flynn LM; Honberg RS
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):174-92. PubMed ID: 15573436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Regulation of research on the decisionally impaired: history and gaps in the current regulatory system.
Moreno JD
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 15573427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. In harm's way: research subjects who are decisionally impaired.
Sundram CJ
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):36-65. PubMed ID: 15573429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Psychiatric guinea pigs are left in limbo.
Boyce N
New Sci; 1998 Nov; 160(2162):21. PubMed ID: 11660595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Appointing a proxy for research consent after one develops dementia: the need for further study.
Kim SY; Kieburtz K
Neurology; 2006 May; 66(9):1298-9. PubMed ID: 16682657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Regulating research with decisionally impaired individuals: are we making progress?
Hoffmann DE; Schwartz J; DeRenzo EG
DePaul J Health Care Law; 2000; 3(3-4):547-608. PubMed ID: 16594106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. "A place like that": advance directives and nursing home admissions.
Kapp MB
Psychol Public Policy Law; 1998 Sep; 4(3):805-28. PubMed ID: 12807100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of controversial research in the IRB's risk/benefit analysis.
Lunstroth J
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):14-6. PubMed ID: 21534141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Knowing their own minds: psychiatric patients agreeing to clinical trials may not realise what they're letting themselves in for. Can new guidelines protect them without hampering research into crucial new drugs?
Boyce N
New Sci; 1998 Jun; 158(2139):20-1. PubMed ID: 11657476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The capacity to appoint a proxy and the possibility of concurrent proxy directives.
Kim SY; Appelbaum PS
Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(4):469-78. PubMed ID: 16883617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
