525 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15119444)
1. Can intraspecific competition drive disruptive selection? An experimental test in natural populations of sticklebacks.
Bolnick DI
Evolution; 2004 Mar; 58(3):608-18. PubMed ID: 15119444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictable patterns of disruptive selection in stickleback in postglacial lakes.
Bolnick DI; Lau OL
Am Nat; 2008 Jul; 172(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 18452402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Disruptive selection in natural populations: the roles of ecological specialization and resource competition.
Martin RA; Pfennig DW
Am Nat; 2009 Aug; 174(2):268-81. PubMed ID: 19527118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sexual dimorphism and speciation on two ecological coins: patterns from nature and theoretical predictions.
Cooper IA; Gilman RT; Boughman JW
Evolution; 2011 Sep; 65(9):2553-71. PubMed ID: 21884056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Character shifts in the defensive armor of sympatric sticklebacks.
Vamosi SM; Schluter D
Evolution; 2004 Feb; 58(2):376-85. PubMed ID: 15068354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The shape of the competition and carrying capacity kernels affects the likelihood of disruptive selection.
Baptestini EM; de Aguiar MA; Bolnick DI; Araújo MS
J Theor Biol; 2009 Jul; 259(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 19285511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Foraging trait (co)variances in stickleback evolve deterministically and do not predict trajectories of adaptive diversification.
Berner D; Stutz WE; Bolnick DI
Evolution; 2010 Aug; 64(8):2265-77. PubMed ID: 20199566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Natural selection drives patterns of lake-stream divergence in stickleback foraging morphology.
Berner D; Adams DC; Grandchamp AC; Hendry AP
J Evol Biol; 2008 Nov; 21(6):1653-65. PubMed ID: 18691241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experimental evidence that competition and habitat use shape the individual fitness surface.
Calsbeek R
J Evol Biol; 2009 Jan; 22(1):97-108. PubMed ID: 19120813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fluctuating population dynamics promotes the evolution of phenotypic plasticity.
Svanbäck R; Pineda-Krch M; Doebeli M
Am Nat; 2009 Aug; 174(2):176-89. PubMed ID: 19519278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intraspecific competition drives increased resource use diversity within a natural population.
Svanbäck R; Bolnick DI
Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Mar; 274(1611):839-44. PubMed ID: 17251094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speciation through competition: a critical review.
Polechová J; Barton NH
Evolution; 2005 Jun; 59(6):1194-210. PubMed ID: 16050097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An experimental test of the effects of resources and sex ratio on maternal fitness and phenotypic selection in gynodioecious Fragaria virginiana.
Case AL; Ashman TL
Evolution; 2007 Aug; 61(8):1900-11. PubMed ID: 17683432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The evolution of genetic architecture under frequency-dependent disruptive selection.
Kopp M; Hermisson J
Evolution; 2006 Aug; 60(8):1537-50. PubMed ID: 17017055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The conditions for speciation through intraspecific competition.
Bürger R; Schneider KA; Willensdorfer M
Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2185-206. PubMed ID: 17236413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Field and experimental evidence for competition's role in phenotypic divergence.
Pfennig DW; Rice AM; Martin RA
Evolution; 2007 Feb; 61(2):257-71. PubMed ID: 17348937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Niche specialization influences adaptive phenotypic plasticity in the threespine stickleback.
Svanbäck R; Schluter D
Am Nat; 2012 Jul; 180(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 22673650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraspecific competitive divergence and convergence under assortative mating.
Bürger R; Schneider KA
Am Nat; 2006 Feb; 167(2):190-205. PubMed ID: 16670980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Divergent selection as revealed by P(ST) and QTL-based F(ST) in three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) populations along a coastal-inland gradient.
Raeymaekers JA; Van Houdt JK; Larmuseau MH; Geldof S; Volckaert FA
Mol Ecol; 2007 Feb; 16(4):891-905. PubMed ID: 17284219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Phenotype-dependent native habitat preference facilitates divergence between parapatric lake and stream stickleback.
Bolnick DI; Snowberg LK; Patenia C; Stutz WE; Ingram T; Lau OL
Evolution; 2009 Aug; 63(8):2004-16. PubMed ID: 19473386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
