These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15119454)
1. Implant biomechanics in grafted sinus: a finite element analysis. Fanuscu MI; Vu HV; Poncelet B J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(2):59-68. PubMed ID: 15119454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Load transfer by an implant in a sinus-grafted maxillary model. Fanuscu MI; Iida K; Caputo AA; Nishimura RD Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):667-74. PubMed ID: 14579954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing the influence of crestal cortical bone and sinus floor cortical bone in posterior maxilla bi-cortical dental implantation: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Yan X; Zhang X; Chi W; Ai H; Wu L Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 May; 73(4):312-20. PubMed ID: 25330164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sinus elevation with a cortical bone graft block: a patient-specific three-dimensional finite element study. Schuller-Götzburg P; Entacher K; Petutschnigg A; Pomwenger W; Watzinger F Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):359-68. PubMed ID: 22442776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of implant surface roughness and stiffness of grafted bone on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: a 3D numerical analysis. Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Hsu JT; Tu MG; Shen YW; Wu CL J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Apr; 35(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 18321264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis. Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The biomechanical analysis of simulating implants in function under osteoporotic jawbone by comparing cylindrical, apical tapered, neck tapered, and expandable type implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Xiao JR; Li YF; Guan SM; Song L; Xu LX; Kong L J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):e273-81. PubMed ID: 21367505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bone-implant interface with simulated insertion stress around an immediately loaded dental implant in the anterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Lee JS; Cho IH; Kim YS; Heo SJ; Kwon HB; Lim YJ Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 22442767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor. Koca OL; Eskitascioglu G; Usumez A J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 15623996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of a cuneiform-geometry implant. Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; Barra LP; Lemonge AC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):675-84. PubMed ID: 14579955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Tada S; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Miyakawa O; Kusakari H Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 12814310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bone loading pattern around implants in average and atrophic edentulous maxillae: a finite-element analysis. Meyer U; Vollmer D; Runte C; Bourauel C; Joos U J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2001 Apr; 29(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 11465432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stress patterns on implants in prostheses supported by four or six implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Silva GC; Mendonça JA; Lopes LR; Landre J Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 20369081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Passivity versus unilateral angular misfit: evaluation of stress distribution on implant-supported single crowns: three-dimensional finite element analysis. Gomes EA; Assunção WG; Barão VA; Delben JA; Rocha EP; de Sousa EA J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 21(6):1683-7. PubMed ID: 21119400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Finite element analysis of 2 immediate loading systems in edentulous mandible: rigid and semirigid splinting of implants. Teixeira MF; Ramalho SA; de Mattias Sartori IA; Lehmann RB Implant Dent; 2010 Feb; 19(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 20147815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures. Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]