BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15119457)

  • 1. Technique for achieving a passive framework fit: a clinical case report.
    Swallow ST
    J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(2):83-92. PubMed ID: 15119457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of splinted and nonsplinted impression techniques on the accuracy of fit of fixed implant prostheses in edentulous patients: a comparative study.
    Papaspyridakos P; Lal K; White GS; Weber HP; Gallucci GO
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1267-72. PubMed ID: 22167432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving implant framework passive fit and accuracy through the use of verification stents and casts.
    Schneider A; Kurtzman GM; Silverstein LH
    J Dent Technol; 2001 Jun; 18(4):23-5. PubMed ID: 11933718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metal-ceramic screw-retained implant fixed partial denture with intraoral luted framework to improve passive fit.
    Baig MR; Gunaseelan R
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Apr; 38(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 20932151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses fabricated on master casts made from a dental stone and a dental plaster.
    Wise M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):532-8. PubMed ID: 11725282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses with multiple abutments.
    Naconecy MM; Teixeira ER; Shinkai RS; Frasca LC; Cervieri A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 15101589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA; Arioli-Filho JN; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):226-36. PubMed ID: 18548918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants.
    Lee YJ; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 19865622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A combined impression technique for a partial implant-supported fixed-detachable restoration.
    Kohavi D
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Mar; 28(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 9452684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of an extraoral verification template for dental implant-supported prostheses.
    Silverstein LH; Kurtzman GM; Schneider A; Shatz PC
    J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(4):184-8. PubMed ID: 12498465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of verification jig on framework fit for nonsegmented fixed implant-supported complete denture.
    Ercoli C; Geminiani A; Feng C; Lee H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e188-95. PubMed ID: 22176765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Full-arch metal-resin cement- and screw-retained provisional restoration for immediately loaded implants.
    Baig MR; Rajan G
    J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 20553176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of impressions for internal-connection implant prostheses with various divergent angles.
    Jang HK; Kim S; Shim JS; Lee KW; Moon HS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1011-5. PubMed ID: 22010084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of different screw-tightening techniques on the strain generated on an internal-connection implant superstructure. Part 2: Models created with a splinted impression technique.
    Choi JH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1016-23. PubMed ID: 22010085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Master cast implant impression: using the open-tray technique.
    Briley TF
    Dent Implantol Update; 2002 Oct; 13(10):73-80. PubMed ID: 12455316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An implant-transfer technique without impression material.
    Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Aparecida Delben J; dos-Santos PH; Ricardo Barão VA; Tabata LF
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 21(4):1274-6. PubMed ID: 20613612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of implant impression techniques.
    Assif D; Marshak B; Schmidt A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 8666454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A method for fabrication of implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
    Zafiropoulos GG; Hoffmann O; Deli G
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Jun; 40(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 24914913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.