These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15119457)

  • 1. Technique for achieving a passive framework fit: a clinical case report.
    Swallow ST
    J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(2):83-92. PubMed ID: 15119457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of splinted and nonsplinted impression techniques on the accuracy of fit of fixed implant prostheses in edentulous patients: a comparative study.
    Papaspyridakos P; Lal K; White GS; Weber HP; Gallucci GO
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1267-72. PubMed ID: 22167432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving implant framework passive fit and accuracy through the use of verification stents and casts.
    Schneider A; Kurtzman GM; Silverstein LH
    J Dent Technol; 2001 Jun; 18(4):23-5. PubMed ID: 11933718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metal-ceramic screw-retained implant fixed partial denture with intraoral luted framework to improve passive fit.
    Baig MR; Gunaseelan R
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Apr; 38(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 20932151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses fabricated on master casts made from a dental stone and a dental plaster.
    Wise M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):532-8. PubMed ID: 11725282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses with multiple abutments.
    Naconecy MM; Teixeira ER; Shinkai RS; Frasca LC; Cervieri A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 15101589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA; Arioli-Filho JN; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):226-36. PubMed ID: 18548918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants.
    Lee YJ; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 19865622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A combined impression technique for a partial implant-supported fixed-detachable restoration.
    Kohavi D
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Mar; 28(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 9452684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of an extraoral verification template for dental implant-supported prostheses.
    Silverstein LH; Kurtzman GM; Schneider A; Shatz PC
    J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(4):184-8. PubMed ID: 12498465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of verification jig on framework fit for nonsegmented fixed implant-supported complete denture.
    Ercoli C; Geminiani A; Feng C; Lee H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e188-95. PubMed ID: 22176765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Full-arch metal-resin cement- and screw-retained provisional restoration for immediately loaded implants.
    Baig MR; Rajan G
    J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 20553176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of impressions for internal-connection implant prostheses with various divergent angles.
    Jang HK; Kim S; Shim JS; Lee KW; Moon HS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1011-5. PubMed ID: 22010084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of different screw-tightening techniques on the strain generated on an internal-connection implant superstructure. Part 2: Models created with a splinted impression technique.
    Choi JH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1016-23. PubMed ID: 22010085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Master cast implant impression: using the open-tray technique.
    Briley TF
    Dent Implantol Update; 2002 Oct; 13(10):73-80. PubMed ID: 12455316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An implant-transfer technique without impression material.
    Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Aparecida Delben J; dos-Santos PH; Ricardo Barão VA; Tabata LF
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 21(4):1274-6. PubMed ID: 20613612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of implant impression techniques.
    Assif D; Marshak B; Schmidt A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 8666454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A method for fabrication of implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
    Zafiropoulos GG; Hoffmann O; Deli G
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Jun; 40(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 24914913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.