BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15119678)

  • 1. Histologic evaluation of adhesive restorations on dentin caries in rat molar teeth.
    Shimada Y; Kawashima M; Higashi T; Foxton RM; Tagami J
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Mar; 35(3):200-5. PubMed ID: 15119678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fluid flow after resin-composite restoration in extracted carious teeth.
    Banomyong D; Palamara JE; Messer HH; Burrow MF
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 19583764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of Er:YAG laser on the sealing of glass ionomer cement restorations of bacterial artificial root caries.
    Mello AM; Mayer MP; Mello FA; Matos AB; Marques MM
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2006 Aug; 24(4):467-73. PubMed ID: 16942426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pulpal response to a newly developed MMA based resin cement for bonding tooth-colored indirect restorations.
    Seki Y; Shimada Y; Foxton RM; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 17076029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer cement containing antibiotics on caries lesion microorganisms.
    Pinheiro SL; Simionato MR; Imparato JC; Oda M
    Am J Dent; 2005 Aug; 18(4):261-6. PubMed ID: 16296434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ultrastructural and microbiological analysis of the dentin layers affected by caries lesions in primary molars treated by minimal intervention.
    Wambier DS; dos Santos FA; Guedes-Pinto AC; Jaeger RG; Simionato MR
    Pediatr Dent; 2007; 29(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 17688020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pulp response and cytotoxicity evaluation of 2 dentin bonding agents.
    Demarco FF; Tarquinio SB; Jaeger MM; de Araújo VC; Matson E
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Mar; 32(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 12066661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An in vitro investigation of marginal dentine caries abutting composite resin and glass ionomer cement restorations.
    Knight GM; McIntyre JM; Craig GG; Mulyani ; Zilm PS; Gully NJ
    Aust Dent J; 2007 Sep; 52(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 17969286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Indirect pulp treatment: in vivo outcomes of an adhesive resin system vs calcium hydroxide for protection of the dentin-pulp complex.
    Falster CA; Araujo FB; Straffon LH; Nör JE
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 12064499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical and microbiological performance of resin-modified glass-ionomer liners after incomplete dentine caries removal.
    Duque C; Negrini Tde C; Sacono NT; Spolidorio DM; de Souza Costa CA; Hebling J
    Clin Oral Investig; 2009 Dec; 13(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 19548010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Caries-preventive effect of a one-time application of composite resin and glass ionomer sealants after 5 years.
    Beiruti N; Frencken JE; van't Hof MA; Taifour D; van Palenstein Helderman WH
    Caries Res; 2006; 40(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 16352882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of a flowable resin composite and flowable compomer for preventive resin restorations.
    Qin M; Liu H
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(5):580-7. PubMed ID: 16268391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of luting cement on dental biofilm composition and secondary caries around metallic restorations in situ.
    Moura JS; Lima EM; Paes Leme AF; Del Bel Cury AA; Tabchoury CP; Cury JA
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(5):509-14. PubMed ID: 15470872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Partial caries removal in primary teeth: association of clinical parameters with microbiological status.
    Lula EC; Almeida LJ; Alves CM; Monteiro-Neto V; Ribeiro CC
    Caries Res; 2011; 45(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 21576960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical performance and SEM evaluation of direct composite restorations in primary molars.
    Puppin-Rontani RM; de Góes MF; Voelske CE; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):255-61. PubMed ID: 17073199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sealing properties of a self-etching primer system to normal caries-affected and caries-infected dentin.
    Lee KW; Son HH; Yoshiyama M; Tay FR; Carvalho RM; Pashley DH
    Am J Dent; 2003 Sep; 16 Spec No():68A-72A. PubMed ID: 14674503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A clinical, radiographic, and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of adhesive restorations on carious dentin in primary teeth.
    Ribeiro CC; Baratieri LN; Perdigão J; Baratieri NM; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Sep; 30(9):591-9. PubMed ID: 10765864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification of hierarchical factors to guide clinical decision making for successful long-term pulp capping.
    Murray PE; Hafez AA; Smith AJ; Cox CF
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 12674361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Partial caries removal and cariostatic materials in carious primary molar teeth: a randomised controlled clinical trial.
    Foley J; Evans D; Blackwell A
    Br Dent J; 2004 Dec; 197(11):697-701; discussion 689. PubMed ID: 15592552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.