277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15119678)
41. Dental fracture fragment attachment: fracture model and luting agent comparisons.
Dean JA; Bullard G; Long RW; Moore BK; McDonald SM
J Indiana Dent Assoc; 2004; 83(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 15266732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Dentin bonding, caries control.
Swift EJ
J Esthet Dent; 2000; 12(5):236-7. PubMed ID: 11338489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Histomorphologic characterization and bond strength evaluation of caries-affected dentin/resin interfaces: effects of long-term water exposure.
Erhardt MC; Toledano M; Osorio R; Pimenta LA
Dent Mater; 2008 Jun; 24(6):786-98. PubMed ID: 18023859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Clinical and antibacterial effectiveness of three different sealant materials.
Amin HE
J Dent Hyg; 2008; 82(5):45. PubMed ID: 19055885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Single-step, self-etch adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. Part III. Evidence from fluid conductance and artificial caries inhibition.
Itthagarun A; Tay FR; Pashley DH; Wefel JS; García-Godoy F; Wei SH
Am J Dent; 2004 Dec; 17(6):394-400. PubMed ID: 15724748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. An in vitro comparison of marginal microleakage of alternative restorative treatment and conventional glass ionomer restorations in extracted permanent molars.
Wadenya R; Mante FK
Pediatr Dent; 2007; 29(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 17867395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. A 6-year follow-up.
van Dijken JW
J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):541-7. PubMed ID: 16005793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The material science of minimally invasive esthetic restorations.
Nový BB; Fuller CE
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2008; 29(6):338-46; quiz 347. PubMed ID: 18795638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Ability of different restorative materials to prevent in situ secondary caries: analysis by polarized light-microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray.
Paradella TC; Koga-Ito CY; Jorge AO
Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Aug; 116(4):375-80. PubMed ID: 18705806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Bond strength and failure patterns of adhesive restorations in primary teeth aged in the oral environment.
Casagrande L; de Hipólito V; de Góes MF; Barata JS; Garcia-Godoy F; de Araújo FB
Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):279-82. PubMed ID: 17073204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Demineralization inhibition of direct tooth-colored restorative materials.
Gonzalez Ede H; Yap AU; Hsu SC
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(5):578-85. PubMed ID: 15470881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. In vitro analysis of inhibitory effects of the antibacterial monomer MDPB-containing restorations on the progression of secondary root caries.
Thomé T; Mayer MP; Imazato S; Geraldo-Martins VR; Marques MM
J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):705-11. PubMed ID: 19540033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Recreating Mother Nature with direct resin restorations.
Nazarian A
Dent Today; 2009 Apr; 28(4):82, 84. PubMed ID: 19408587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. In vitro inhibition of marginal caries-like lesions with fluoride-containing amalgam.
Valenzuela VS; Abarca AM; Silva ND; Franco ME; Huerta JM
Oper Dent; 1994; 19(3):91-6. PubMed ID: 9028246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Pulpal response to a fluoride-releasing all-in-one resin bonding system.
Sonoda H; Sasafuchi Y; Kitasako Y; Arakawa M; Otsuki M; Tagami J
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):271-7. PubMed ID: 12022459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Sealing Dentin Caries with Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Decreases Lesion Progression and Bacterial Survival in an Experimental Model.
Contardo MS; Muñoz-Sandoval C; Giacaman RA
J Adhes Dent; 2015 Jun; 17(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 25893224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The effect of glass-ionomer cement on carious dentine: an in vivo study.
Weerheijm KL; de Soet JJ; van Amerongen WE; de Graaff J
Caries Res; 1993; 27(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 8242680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Confocal laser scanning microscopic observations of secondary caries inhibition around different types of luting cements.
Umino A; Nikaido T; Tsuchiya S; Foxton RM; Tagami J
Am J Dent; 2005 Aug; 18(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 16296431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The influence of fatigue loading on the quality of the cement layer and retention strength of carbon fiber post-resin composite core restorations.
Bolhuis P; de Gee A; Feilzer A
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):220-7. PubMed ID: 15853108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
