66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15119713)
1. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect-composite and ceramic inlay systems.
Soares CJ; Martins LR; Pfeifer JM; Giannini M
Quintessence Int; 2004 Apr; 35(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 15119713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Co-Influence of Restoration Bonding and Inlay Cavity Design on Fracture Load of Restored Tooth.
Yli-Urpo T; Lassila L; Vallittu P; Närhi T
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2024 Feb; 32(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 37549134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture Resistance of Laboratory Composite Versus All-Ceramic Restorations in Class II Inlay Cavity Preparations: An In Vitro Study.
Agarwal S; Gupta V; Srinkhala ; Singh S; Saxena P; Marvaniya J
Cureus; 2023 Sep; 15(9):e44711. PubMed ID: 37809271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In Vitro Comparative Analysis of Fracture Resistance in Inlay Restoration Prepared with CAD-CAM and Different Systems in the Primary Teeth.
Simsek H; Derelioglu S
Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():4292761. PubMed ID: 27830145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. WITHDRAWN: Ceramic inlays for restoring posterior teeth.
Yeung CA; Hayashi M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Sep; 2015(9):CD003450. PubMed ID: 26418289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Survival and success of endocrowns: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Al-Dabbagh RA
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):415.e1-415.e9. PubMed ID: 32197821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the influence of various restoration techniques on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth with different cavity wall thicknesses.
Basaran ET; Gokce Y
Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Mar; 22(3):328-334. PubMed ID: 30837419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of fracture resistance in root canal-treated teeth restored using different techniques.
Aslan T; Sagsen B; Er Ö; Ustun Y; Cinar F
Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Jun; 21(6):795-800. PubMed ID: 29888730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Short fiber-reinforced composite restorations: A review of the current literature.
Garoushi S; Gargoum A; Vallittu PK; Lassila L
J Investig Clin Dent; 2018 Aug; 9(3):e12330. PubMed ID: 29479830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Direct versus indirect inlay/onlay composite restorations in posterior teeth. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Angeletaki F; Gkogkos A; Papazoglou E; Kloukos D
J Dent; 2016 Oct; 53():12-21. PubMed ID: 27452342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Survival Rate of Resin and Ceramic Inlays, Onlays, and Overlays: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Morimoto S; Rebello de Sampaio FB; Braga MM; Sesma N; Özcan M
J Dent Res; 2016 Aug; 95(9):985-94. PubMed ID: 27287305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stress distribution in premolars restored with inlays or onlays: 3D finite element analysis.
Yang H; Park C; Shin JH; Yun KD; Lim HP; Park SW; Chung H
J Adv Prosthodont; 2018 Jun; 10(3):184-190. PubMed ID: 29930787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture Resistance of Partial Indirect Restorations Made With CAD/CAM Technology. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Amesti-Garaizabal A; Agustín-Panadero R; Verdejo-Solá B; Fons-Font A; Fernández-Estevan L; Montiel-Company J; Solá-Ruíz MF
J Clin Med; 2019 Nov; 8(11):. PubMed ID: 31717610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with all-ceramic inlays and onlays: an in vitro study.
Saridag S; Sevimay M; Pekkan G
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(6):626-34. PubMed ID: 23391033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlay and resin composite: an in vitro study.
Desai PD; Das UK
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):877. PubMed ID: 22484893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
Cobankara FK; Unlu N; Cetin AR; Ozkan HB
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques.
Santos MJ; Bezerra RB
J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep; 71(8):585. PubMed ID: 16202199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of virgilite-based occlusal veneers with varying thickness.
Rizk A; El-Guindy J; Abdou A; Ashraf R; Kusumasari C; Eldin FE
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):307. PubMed ID: 38443910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fatigue behavior and stress distribution of molars restored with MOD inlays with and without deep margin elevation.
Grassi EDA; de Andrade GS; Tribst JPM; Machry RV; Valandro LF; Ramos NC; Bresciani E; Saavedra GSFA
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Mar; 26(3):2513-2526. PubMed ID: 34643807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of Endodontic Access Cavity Design and Thermocycling on Fracture Strength of Endodontically Treated Teeth.
Saberi EA; Pirhaji A; Zabetiyan F
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent; 2020; 12():149-156. PubMed ID: 32368154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
