341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15119713)
21. Fracture resistance and microtensile bond strength of maxillary premolars restored with two resin composite inlay systems.
Sun YS; Chen YM; Smales RJ; Yip KH
Am J Dent; 2008 Apr; 21(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 18578176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Fracture resistance of thermal cycled and endodontically treated premolars with adhesive restorations.
de V Habekost L; Camacho GB; Azevedo EC; Demarco FF
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 17854619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite.
Belli S; Erdemir A; Ozcopur M; Eskitascioglu G
Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 15667628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fracture resistance of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic inlays.
Esquivel-Upshaw JF; Anusavice KJ; Yang MC; Lee RB
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 11843445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations.
Plotino G; Buono L; Grande NM; Lamorgese V; Somma F
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18319094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials.
Stappert CF; Chitmongkolsuk S; Silva NR; Att W; Strub JR
Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1248-57. PubMed ID: 18395785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. All-ceramic partial coverage restorations on natural molars. Masticatory fatigue loading and fracture resistance.
Stappert CF; Guess PC; Chitmongkolsuk S; Gerds T; Strub JR
Am J Dent; 2007 Feb; 20(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 17380803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Compressive strength recovery by composite onlays in primary teeth. Substrate treatment and luting agent effects.
Borges AF; Correr GM; Sinhoreti MA; Consani S; Sobrinho LC; Rontani RM
J Dent; 2006 Aug; 34(7):478-84. PubMed ID: 16427182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Combining bonded and cemented restorations: a multitechnique case study.
Shannon A
Dent Today; 2000 Apr; 19(4):54, 56, 58-61; quiz 61, 151. PubMed ID: 19750729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Influence of cavity preparation design on fracture resistance of posterior Leucite-reinforced ceramic restorations.
Soares CJ; Martins LR; Fonseca RB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Fernandes Neto AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):421-9. PubMed ID: 16765154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Influence of different transitional restorations on the fracture resistance of premolar teeth.
Qualtrough AJ; Cawte SG; Wilson NH
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 11357569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Fracture resistance of re-attached coronal fragments--influence of different adhesive materials and bevel preparation.
Demarco FF; Fay RM; Pinzon LM; Powers JM
Dent Traumatol; 2004 Jun; 20(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 15144447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Short-term clinical evaluation of inlay and onlay restorations made with a ceromer.
Monaco C; Baldissara P; dall'Orologio GD; Scotti R
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 11842911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode.
Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Martins LR; Soares CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study.
Ausiello P; Rengo S; Davidson CL; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):862-72. PubMed ID: 15451242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Optimizing preparation design for metal-free composite resin crowns.
Ohlmann B; Gruber R; Eickemeyer G; Rammelsberg P
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):211-9. PubMed ID: 18762033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of restorative material and proximal cavity design on the fracture resistance of MOD inlay restoration.
Liu X; Fok A; Li H
Dent Mater; 2014 Mar; 30(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 24424091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The influence of cavity preparation design on fracture strength and mode of fracture of laboratory-processed composite resin restorations.
Fonseca RB; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Correr-Sobrinho L; Soares CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Oct; 98(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 17936127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
