These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15119720)

  • 1. Bitewing film quality: a clinical comparison of the loop vs. holder techniques.
    Kositbowornchai S; Phadannorg T; Permpoonsinsook M; Thinkhamrop B
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Apr; 35(4):321-5. PubMed ID: 15119720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Observer performance based on marginal bone tissue visibility in Scanora panoramic radiography and posterior bitewing radiography.
    Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rohlin M
    Stomatologija; 2008; 10(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18493164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bitewing examination with four digital receptors.
    Bahrami G; Hagstrøm C; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Sep; 32(5):317-21. PubMed ID: 14709607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the reproducibility of storage phosphor and film bitewings for assessment of alveolar bone loss.
    Henriksson CH; Stermer EM; Aass AM; Sandvik L; Møystad A
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2008; 66(6):380-4. PubMed ID: 18932094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Utility of a Newly Designed Film Holder for Premolar Bitewing Radiography.
    Safi Y; Esmaeelinejad M; Vasegh Z; Valizadeh S; Aghdasi MM; Sarani O; Afsahi M
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Nov; 9(11):TC04-7. PubMed ID: 26675339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A study to determine and assess the diagnostic quality of bitewing radiographs taken by two methods: using paper bite tags and using a proprietary film holder.
    Sapong MK
    Proc Br Soc Dent Maxillofac Radiol; 1994; (6):37-49. PubMed ID: 9611467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assembly and clinical use of the XCP-ORA: a three-function dental X-ray film positioning device for taking anterior and posterior periapical and bitewing intraoral radiographs.
    Mamoun JS
    Dent Assist; 2011; 80(3):38-40, 42-3. PubMed ID: 21739876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative study of three periapical radiographic techniques for endodontic working length estimation.
    Kazzi D; Horner K; Qualtrough AC; Martinez-Beneyto Y; Rushton VE
    Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):526-31. PubMed ID: 17459119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of technique errors of intraoral radiographs taken on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates.
    Zhang W; Huynh CP; Abramovitch K; Leon IL; Arvizu L
    Tex Dent J; 2012 Jun; 129(6):589-96. PubMed ID: 22866414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scanning resolution and the detection of approximal caries.
    Janhom A; van Ginkel FC; van Amerongen JP; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 11420630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality of bitewing radiographs in children in relation to the type of film holder used.
    Herman HD; Ashkenazi M
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2013 Jun; 14(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 23595621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Technique tips--the importance of a bitewing radiograph in the endodontic assessment of posterior teeth.
    Ray-Chaudhuri A; Buth S; Briggs P
    Dent Update; 2014 Apr; 41(3):280-1. PubMed ID: 24839717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A two-film versus a four-film bite-wing examination for caries diagnosis in adults.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A
    Caries Res; 1999; 33(5):380-6. PubMed ID: 10460962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. X-rays and the green factor: balancing efficacy and risk.
    Monteith B
    N Z Dent J; 1999 Mar; 95(419):21-2. PubMed ID: 10208081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of tube voltage on radiographic diagnosis of caries in premolars and molars.
    Svenson B; Petersson A
    Swed Dent J; 1991; 15(5):245-50. PubMed ID: 1767370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is it true that the radiation dose to which patients are exposed has decreased with modern radiographic films?
    Alcaraz M; Parra C; Martínez Beneyto Y; Velasco E; Canteras M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Feb; 38(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 19176651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection.
    Alkurt MT; Peker I; Bala O; Altunkaynak B
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 17910228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pediatric bitewing film holder: preschoolers' acceptance and radiographs' diagnostic quality.
    Pierro VS; Barcelos R; de Souza IP; Raymundo RJ
    Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 18767515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assembly and clinical use of the XCP dental x-ray film holder and orientation devices in dentistry.
    Mamoun JS
    Dent Assist; 2011; 80(1):8, 10, 12-4 passim. PubMed ID: 21443076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a simple modified radiographic alignment system for routine use.
    Carpio LC; Hausmann E; Dunford RG; Allen KM; Christersson LA
    J Periodontol; 1994 Jan; 65(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 8133416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.