These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15119779)
1. [The balanced force and the GT-rotary technique in comparison with the non-instrumental technique (NIT)]. Lussi A; Hotz M; Stich H Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2004; 114(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 15119779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cleaning efficacy using two engine-driven systems versus manual instrumentation in curved root canals: a scanning electron microscopic study. Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Alvarez Serrano S; Hernandez SR J Endod; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1279-82. PubMed ID: 21846548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [In vitro comparison of root canal preparation with step-back technique and GT rotary file--a nickel-titanium engine driven rotary instrument system]. Krajczár K; Tóth V; Nyárády Z; Szabó G Fogorv Sz; 2005 Jun; 98(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 16108416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Root canal debris removal using different irrigating needles: an SEM study. Ghivari S; Kubasad G Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(5):659-63. PubMed ID: 22406709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Schäfer E; Vlassis M Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the effect of various irrigants on apically extruded debris after root canal preparation. Parirokh M; Jalali S; Haghdoost AA; Abbott PV J Endod; 2012 Feb; 38(2):196-9. PubMed ID: 22244635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size. Tan BT; Messer HH J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reduction of hard-tissue debris accumulation during rotary root canal instrumentation by etidronic acid in a sodium hypochlorite irrigant. Paqué F; Rechenberg DK; Zehnder M J Endod; 2012 May; 38(5):692-5. PubMed ID: 22515905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reciprocating root canal technique induces greater debris accumulation than a continuous rotary technique as assessed by 3-dimensional micro-computed tomography. Robinson JP; Lumley PJ; Cooper PR; Grover LM; Walmsley AD J Endod; 2013 Aug; 39(8):1067-70. PubMed ID: 23880279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of two devices for root canal cleansing by the noninstrumentation technology. Lussi A; Portmann P; Nussbächer U; Imwinkelried S; Grosrey J J Endod; 1999 Jan; 25(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 10196836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of various concentrations of NaOCl and instrumentation techniques in reducing Enterococcus faecalis within root canals and dentinal tubules. Berber VB; Gomes BP; Sena NT; Vianna ME; Ferraz CC; Zaia AA; Souza-Filho FJ Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 16409323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical evaluation of the cleansing properties of the noninstrumental technique for cleaning root canals. Attin T; Buchalla W; Zirkel C; Lussi A Int Endod J; 2002 Nov; 35(11):929-33. PubMed ID: 12453022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation to remove artificially placed dentine debris from different-sized simulated plastic root canals. Lee SJ; Wu MK; Wesselink PR Int Endod J; 2004 Sep; 37(9):607-12. PubMed ID: 15317564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of apical size and taper on volume of irrigant delivered at working length with apical negative pressure at different root curvatures. de Gregorio C; Arias A; Navarrete N; Del Rio V; Oltra E; Cohenca N J Endod; 2013 Jan; 39(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 23228270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the smear layer after the use of sodium hypochlorite gel and solution forms as root canal irrigants. Zand V; Lotfi M; Rahimi S; Mokhtari H; Kazemi A; Sakhamanesh V J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1234-7. PubMed ID: 20630306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of a continuous ultrasonic irrigation device and conventional needle irrigation in the removal of root canal debris. Curtis TO; Sedgley CM J Endod; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1261-4. PubMed ID: 22892747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of root canal preparation with two rotary NiTi instruments: ProFile .04 and GT Rotary. Rödig T; Hülsmann M; Kahlmeier C Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):553-62. PubMed ID: 17511784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Debris remaining in the apical third of root canals after chemomechanical preparation by using sodium hypochlorite and glyde: an in vivo study. Cruz A; Vera J; Gascón G; Palafox-Sánchez CA; Amezcua O; Mercado G J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1419-23. PubMed ID: 25146024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro comparisons of debris removal of the EndoActivator system, the F file, ultrasonic irrigation, and NaOCl irrigation alone after hand-rotary instrumentation in human mandibular molars. Klyn SL; Kirkpatrick TC; Rutledge RE J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1367-71. PubMed ID: 20647098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hard-tissue debris accumulation created by conventional rotary versus self-adjusting file instrumentation in mesial root canal systems of mandibular molars. Paqué F; Al-Jadaa A; Kfir A Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 22188277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]